Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
With better parameters. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@soadD Have you actually tried using pmf with vectors (e.g., sequences) to see if it helps with your "noise" issue? Specifically, the help provides the following example for specifying the ws and th parameters, in which it specifies that both should be sequences: LASfile <- system.file("extdata", "Topography.laz", package="lidR")
las <- readLAS(LASfile, select = "xyzrn", filter = "-inside 273450 5274350 273550 5274450")
ws <- seq(3,12, 3)
th <- seq(0.1, 1.5, length.out = length(ws))
las <- classify_ground(las, pmf(ws, th)) Sure the book (lidR book) provides example where the parameters are both single values and sequences, but what JR was trying to say if that if you a single numerical value for each window and threshold parameter, it's not actually "progressive", it's just a "morphological filter" at that point and not really being used as intended. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Struggling with some outliers in my PMF Ground Classification, where i can't filter out some points. I've succeced in removing them when I've put the ground in another variable, with the funcion filter_noise, but had no luck with the las itself.
Any ideas with what to do ?
My las keeps this way
As opposed to what i've achieved filtering the ground
edit.: I've changed some parameters in the pmf algorithm and but despite the new ground classification i got a good result when I made the dtm something weird happened, pics below:
new code
Triangular irregular network
Kriging
So, my question would be if i can post process the first ground classification as it has a better dtm representation besides the outliers.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions