Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Actually a note about 'complicated' syntax is understandable. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Why not rely on the external OS pipe? Like powershell or bash? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Opening a discussion for #14004 and closing the ticket.
The idea is to be able to write something like this:
the idea is that we want to be able to use pipes ini r2 commands, but r2 commands dont get anything from stdin, so instead of using babckticks and @@ iterators we need a way to express it in a pipe-form, similiar to how
xargs
work in unixIn that case that would work the same way as this:
But as long as || acts as
stdin
we may probably want to handle stdin pipes in more commands likew
for writing strings passed as stdin, those expressions could be groupped inside iterators @@.Maybe this ticket should be moved into the discussions tab
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions