You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, the science infrastructure components need to be related somehow to the science infrastructure via the configurations. For example, there is a 1:M relationship between instruments and apertures or gratings, and this configuration represents a distinct state. So ... is the relation in that one telescope could have either grating or any of a number of apertures sufficient? Does more need to be done?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the ontology has
However, the science infrastructure components need to be related somehow to the science infrastructure via the configurations. For example, there is a 1:M relationship between instruments and apertures or gratings, and this configuration represents a distinct state. So ... is the relation in that one telescope could have either grating or any of a number of apertures sufficient? Does more need to be done?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: