Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add count to the reserved names list #167

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2017

Conversation

carbonin
Copy link
Contributor

We ran into this issue by using :count as a key in our settings here

/cc @yrudman @Fryguy

Copy link
Member

@pkuczynski pkuczynski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please remove spec/fixtures/.development.yml.swp form this pull request? It seems it has been added accidentally..

@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
select: 123
collect: 456
section:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why adding this keyword deeper in the tree instead of on the same level as other reserved keywords?

@carbonin carbonin force-pushed the add_count_to_reserved_names branch from bfb60b1 to 50540e3 Compare March 23, 2017 22:09
@carbonin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry about that. Just fixed it up.

@pkuczynski
Copy link
Member

No worries. Looks good. Thanks! :)

@pkuczynski pkuczynski merged commit 4b67740 into rubyconfig:master Mar 23, 2017
@carbonin carbonin deleted the add_count_to_reserved_names branch May 18, 2017 17:13
@pkuczynski pkuczynski added this to the 1.5.0 milestone Oct 23, 2017
carbonin added a commit to carbonin/manageiq that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2018
This pulls in rubyconfig/config#167
which allows us to reference keys called "count" properly
carbonin added a commit to carbonin/manageiq that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2018
This pulls in rubyconfig/config#167
which allows us to reference keys called "count" properly
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants