-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OSS-668: Rasa Knowledge base actions are unable to query about a certain attribute of an object unless the user first asks to obtain a list of objects of a specific type. #922
Conversation
Pulling updates from RasaHQ/rasa-sdk main branch to rootcodelabs/rasa-sdk OSS-668 branch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Many thanks for your contribution 💯
I have left some suggestions and questions about implementation choices in this PR. Please troubleshoot the failing unit tests as can be seen in the CI runs (for example 3.10 job run) and also add unit tests for the functionality you've added. You can run the tests locally too through your IDE or running make test
in a venv where you've installed rasa-sdk.
Thanks @ancalita for the feedback! We will work on it to make the changes. |
Pulling updates from RasaHQ/rasa-sdk main to rootcodelabs/rasa-sdk OSS-668
…the contribution changes
RAOC-5: added comprehensive typing hint
RAOC-10: Uncommented code snippet that was previously commented
…suggested in PR review
OSS-668-PR-CHANGES: Made requested changes in PR Review#3
Thanks for sharing your initial comments @ancalita 🙌🏽 . We have addressed the requested changes here and in the docs PR in rasa repo. |
Pulling updates from RasaHQ/rasa-sdk main to rootcodelabs/rasa-sdk OSS-668
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good 💯 ! Very close to getting merged as well as soon as the last few comments on the unit test are addressed 👍🏻
Pulling updates from OSS-668 to OSS-668-PR-CHANGES
…eck inside actual event list
Incorporated Changes Suggested in PR Review #4
Pulling updates from OSS-668 to OSS-668-PR-CHANGES
Re: Added comments in tracker event assertion code block
Great to hear that @ancalita 🤞🏽! We have addressed your comments and made the requested changes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice one 🎉 Thank you for all your hard work 🥇
Congratulations @Gajithra and @Thirunayan22 🎉, would love to see you in contributor's program as well. Thank you @ancalita for leading this 💜 Sorry this is my official account 👍 |
Hey @Thirunayan22 and @Gajithra , Can you please share your email ids, here or mail them at s.pankaj@rasa.com, So that I can add both of you in our contributor's program and send some swags. Thanks, |
Hi @sonam-pankaj95 , here are our email ids. I have sent the email addresses to you in email too. Thirunayan: thirunayan.dinesh@rootcode.io |
Proposed changes:
object_type
can be inferred by utilizing the entity classification (DIET) where object types are used as entities to annotate object names.object_type
.Status (please check what you already did):
black
(please check Readme for instructions)