Skip to content

Commit 1098803

Browse files
fdmananagregkh
authored andcommitted
Btrfs: fix deadlock between clone/dedupe and rename
commit 4ea748e upstream. Reflinking (clone/dedupe) and rename are operations that operate on two inodes and therefore need to lock them in the same order to avoid ABBA deadlocks. It happens that Btrfs' reflink implementation always locked them in a different order from VFS's lock_two_nondirectories() helper, which is used by the rename code in VFS, resulting in ABBA type deadlocks. Btrfs' locking order: static void btrfs_double_inode_lock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2) { if (inode1 < inode2) swap(inode1, inode2); inode_lock_nested(inode1, I_MUTEX_PARENT); inode_lock_nested(inode2, I_MUTEX_CHILD); } VFS's locking order: void lock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2) { if (inode1 > inode2) swap(inode1, inode2); if (inode1 && !S_ISDIR(inode1->i_mode)) inode_lock(inode1); if (inode2 && !S_ISDIR(inode2->i_mode) && inode2 != inode1) inode_lock_nested(inode2, I_MUTEX_NONDIR2); } Fix this by killing the btrfs helper function that does the double inode locking and replace it with VFS's helper lock_two_nondirectories(). Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Fixes: 416161d ("btrfs: offline dedupe") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
1 parent 3486142 commit 1098803

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-18
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-18
lines changed

fs/btrfs/ioctl.c

Lines changed: 3 additions & 18 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3206,21 +3206,6 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_dev_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
32063206
return ret;
32073207
}
32083208

3209-
static void btrfs_double_inode_unlock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
3210-
{
3211-
inode_unlock(inode1);
3212-
inode_unlock(inode2);
3213-
}
3214-
3215-
static void btrfs_double_inode_lock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
3216-
{
3217-
if (inode1 < inode2)
3218-
swap(inode1, inode2);
3219-
3220-
inode_lock_nested(inode1, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
3221-
inode_lock_nested(inode2, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
3222-
}
3223-
32243209
static void btrfs_double_extent_unlock(struct inode *inode1, u64 loff1,
32253210
struct inode *inode2, u64 loff2, u64 len)
32263211
{
@@ -3989,7 +3974,7 @@ static int btrfs_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
39893974
if (same_inode)
39903975
inode_lock(inode_in);
39913976
else
3992-
btrfs_double_inode_lock(inode_in, inode_out);
3977+
lock_two_nondirectories(inode_in, inode_out);
39933978

39943979
/*
39953980
* Now that the inodes are locked, we need to start writeback ourselves
@@ -4039,7 +4024,7 @@ static int btrfs_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
40394024
if (same_inode)
40404025
inode_unlock(inode_in);
40414026
else
4042-
btrfs_double_inode_unlock(inode_in, inode_out);
4027+
unlock_two_nondirectories(inode_in, inode_out);
40434028

40444029
return ret;
40454030
}
@@ -4069,7 +4054,7 @@ loff_t btrfs_remap_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t off,
40694054
if (same_inode)
40704055
inode_unlock(src_inode);
40714056
else
4072-
btrfs_double_inode_unlock(src_inode, dst_inode);
4057+
unlock_two_nondirectories(src_inode, dst_inode);
40734058

40744059
return ret < 0 ? ret : len;
40754060
}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)