-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Moving towards 1.0.0 #158
Comments
Hi. |
According to this document we can drop the support as soon as 04/30/2018. |
4/30/2018 has passed. Are you going to drop |
Yes, we should. I'll do that as soon as I have some free time. |
Looks like |
os-tmpdir has long been dropped 😄 |
@silkentrance Yeah, in master. The last release, however, appears to have been in 2017. |
That's right. I just installed |
So, I would suggest to move the API towards Promise based APIs. Everyone now are using async functions and suddenly using callbacks is just inconvenient. I would be happy to work on the PR if the is the direction the library will move forward as I am using it in multiple projects. |
Just to add to the above point, the |
As is requested by #75.
@raszi I am wanting this to finally reach 1.0.0 this year :D using the current code base. A switch over to typescript would be no problem as it would be transpiled to standard javascript and that would then be released. Or was that not your plan?
As of now, we have the unsupported legacy releases
and we have the
The 0.1.0 we can use for maintenance work in case that major problems arise. The existing issues including the still open issues #129, #155, and #121 should also make it into this release. But we would not integrate new features into that "branch", if any such new features arise in the future.
See also the compatibility notice in the readme on current master.
And from 1.0.0 on I would like to drop support for all node versions < 4.0.0, so we can have #108.
And given 1.0.0 we could be moving to typescript and a gulp based build process, see #157.
What do you think? Sounds like a good plan to me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: