Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(layout): Accept IntoIterator for constraints #663

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2023
Merged

Conversation

joshka
Copy link
Member

@joshka joshka commented Dec 4, 2023

  • style(tabs): fix doc formatting
  • feat(layout): Accept IntoIterator for constraints

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (6a6e9dd) 90.6% compared to head (11b3be0) 90.8%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
src/layout.rs 93.1% 3 Missing ⚠️
src/widgets/tabs.rs 96.9% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main    #663     +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   90.6%   90.8%   +0.1%     
=======================================
  Files         42      42             
  Lines      12311   12349     +38     
=======================================
+ Hits       11163   11220     +57     
+ Misses      1148    1129     -19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@joshka joshka changed the title table width iterable feat(layout): Accept IntoIterator for constraints Dec 4, 2023
src/layout.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@orhun
Copy link
Member

orhun commented Dec 4, 2023

Not sure 7b0ef3d belongs to this PR 🐻

Two changes without any line overlap caused the tabs tests to break
Layout and Table now accept IntoIterator for constraints with an Item
that is AsRef<Constraint>. This allows pretty much any collection of
constraints to be passed to the layout functions including arrays,
vectors, slices, and iterators (without having to call collect() on
them).
@joshka joshka merged commit 6b2efd0 into main Dec 4, 2023
33 checks passed
@joshka joshka deleted the table-width-iterable branch December 4, 2023 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants