Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support of VCI hardware and D-PDU API (ISO 22900-2, J2534, RP1210) #35

Open
etas-lorenz opened this issue Nov 1, 2011 · 6 comments
Open

Comments

@etas-lorenz
Copy link
Contributor

There are at least three similar or extending standards defining a standardized D-PDU API to access Vehicle Communication Interfaces (VCI):

  • [http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=41276](ISO 22900-2): Modular vehicle communication interface (MVCI) -- Part 2: Diagnostic protocol data unit application programming interface (D-PDU API)
  • SAE J2534/1: Recommended Practice for Pass-Thru Vehicle Programming
  • TMC RP1210. TMC is the Technology & Maintenance Council of the ATA (American Trucking Associations).

There are already multiple products out there in the market including some products from ETAS. We should support this.

@Samispence
Copy link

So I have been reading about rp1210's and I agree that we should support it. But can we expect the definition to change in the next couple of years with the development of new technology?

@etas-lorenz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Standards always evolve. RP1210 is already available in versions A and B. I've already seen proposals for version C. To my understanding this is upward compatible.

The same is true for J2534-1 and J2534-2.

So we are not braking anything if we now implement the current standards rather than waiting for updates.

@ZeroAviation
Copy link

Did this actually get implemented? Meaning, can I use a off the shelf J2534 interface with this application? J2534 is pretty generic between hardware, should be somewhat straight forward. Cheers

@yegorich
Copy link
Contributor

Any update on this issue?

Thanks.

@electronslayer
Copy link

I would like to attempt to implement the RP1210B but need some preliminary guidance.

@Fang717
Copy link

Fang717 commented Mar 7, 2023

I think its a good idea to support RP1210 device

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants