Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Product grid pricing not respecting publish status of variants #1521

Closed
aaronjudd opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

Product grid pricing not respecting publish status of variants #1521

aaronjudd opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug For issues that describe a defect or regression in the released software
Milestone

Comments

@aaronjudd
Copy link
Contributor

aaronjudd commented Oct 24, 2016

Related to #1513, #1519

If you archive / delete a variant, where the product grid was previously showing a range, and you archive variants, and leave only one item, the grid is still showing price range based on multiple published variants (that are now archived).

@aaronjudd aaronjudd added ready bug For issues that describe a defect or regression in the released software labels Oct 24, 2016
@aaronjudd aaronjudd changed the title Product grid pricing not respecting publish status of variant pricing Product grid pricing not respecting publish status of variants Oct 24, 2016
@brent-hoover brent-hoover added this to the v0.18.0 milestone Dec 8, 2016
@kieckhafer kieckhafer self-assigned this Dec 12, 2016
@kieckhafer kieckhafer changed the title Product grid pricing not respecting publish status of variants Product grid pricing not respecting publish status of variants Dec 12, 2016
@ghost ghost added review and removed in progress labels Dec 15, 2016
@kieckhafer kieckhafer removed the review label Dec 21, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug For issues that describe a defect or regression in the released software
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants