Clarify installation instructions #1181
Conversation
| @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ This architecture might seem like an overkill for a counter app, but the beauty | |||
|
|
|||
| So, what are you waiting for? | |||
|
|
|||
| #### [Watch the 30 Free Videos!](https://egghead.io/series/getting-started-with-redux) | |||
| #### [Watch the 30 Free Videos!](https://egghead.io/series/getting-started-with-redux) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can revert this change if ya want. My text editor stripped out the extra space.
|
Let's add an explicit paragraph explaining how to install and use the UMD build. |
|
@jmeas Can you add that npmcdn link? Other than that, this looks good! 😄 |
|
@jmeas Any chance you can get to this? I can cherry pick in and add the npmcdn link for you, if not. |
|
I'll add it to my to-do list, and try to get to it in a few days. Since all of the builds export UMD, I think there's some good rephrasing that can be done to capture that important detail. |
|
There's also the counter-vanilla example now that uses npmcdn, which you may way to point to. |
|
Hmmm..."counter-vanilla"? Not sure if I know what ya mean. |
|
Ah, right, haha. Cool, and that's a great idea. I'll add a link to that! |
jamesplease
force-pushed
the
update-installation-instructions
branch
2 times, most recently
from
96f7f29 to
b0ac82d
Compare
|
Mmk, updated with some of the feedback y'all gave. Let me know what ya think, and if there are any other changes you think I should make. |
|
|
||
| It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. On top of that, it provides a great developer experience, such as [live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger](https://github.com/gaearon/redux-devtools). | ||
|
|
||
| You can use Redux together with [React](https://facebook.github.io/react/), or with any other view library. | ||
| You can use Redux together with [React](https://facebook.github.io/react/), or with any other view library. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These spaces are significant. They force Markdown to make a newline.
|
I can fix the spaces. That aside, how are the text changes? |
jamesplease
force-pushed
the
update-installation-instructions
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b38696d to
2a104ce
Compare
The previous instructions may have come across that the only way to use Redux with npm was with a module bundler, like Browserify or Webpack. This reorganizes the text in an effort to more explicitly explain that it's only the extensions require a CJS module bundler.
jamesplease
force-pushed
the
update-installation-instructions
branch
from
2a104ce to
d221deb
Compare
| This assumes that you’re using [npm](https://www.npmjs.com/) package manager with a module bundler like [Webpack](http://webpack.github.io) or [Browserify](http://browserify.org/) to consume [CommonJS modules](http://webpack.github.io/docs/commonjs.html). | ||
|
|
||
| If you don’t yet use [npm](https://www.npmjs.com/) or a modern module bundler, and would rather prefer a single-file [UMD](https://github.com/umdjs/umd) build that makes `Redux` available as a global object, you can grab a pre-built version from [cdnjs](https://cdnjs.com/libraries/redux). We *don’t* recommend this approach for any serious application, as most of the libraries complementary to Redux are only available on [npm](https://www.npmjs.com/). | ||
| Use of the extensions requires that you’re using [npm](https://www.npmjs.com/) in conjunction with a module bundler like [Webpack](http://webpack.github.io) or [Browserify](http://browserify.org/) to consume [CommonJS modules](http://webpack.github.io/docs/commonjs.html). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry for the death by a thousand comments...
I'd change "Use of the extensions requires that you’re using npm" back to something like "This assumes you are using npm", so you avoid having "use" and "using" in the same sentence.
But good catch changing "npm package manager" to just "npm". That's like saying "ATM machine" 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry for the death by a thousand comments...
No problem at all! I want this to be good. I appreciate the thorough feedback.
I'd change "Use of the extensions requires that you’re using npm" back to something like "This assumes you are using npm", so you avoid having "use" and "using" in the same sentence.
I agree that the current wording is awkward. At the same time, I want to say something a little stronger than "this assumes," because that leaves it open that there are other methods (perhaps the CDNs above, or Bower). The existing text (before I made any changes) made it out that these tools can only be used with npm, or only with CommonJS. I just pulled down react-redux, though, and it includes a UMD build all the same. I then checked cdnjs and saw it there, too.
Perhaps the recommendation to stick with npm isn't as strong as it was originally worded, and how I've worded it to be? It looks like the three install methods (npm, Bower, CDNs) may work for all of 3 of these libraries?
If that's the case, I might want to do another restructuring to make that more clear.
Another thought is that maybe the original wording was referring to popular React libraries outside of the mini-Redux ecosystem described here. Is that the case?
Sorry I'm not more knowledgeable, I haven't used Redux much yet :)
But good catch changing "npm package manager" to just "npm". That's like saying "ATM machine"
Heh heh. Maybe not...
|
|
||
| However, if you don’t yet use [npm](https://www.npmjs.com/) or a modern module bundler, you have a few options. | ||
|
|
||
| ##### Bower |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I really don’t want to see us contributing to “Bower is still a good choice for front-end devs” meme by even dedicating it a header. Instead, I would suggest to merge the below two sections, remove cdnjs reference and keep only npmcdn (it’s a better project IMO), and add Bower commend as an afterthought (“If you use an alternative package manager such as Bower, it is possible that your package manager allows installing libraries from URLs, for example: ”). This way it doesn’t look like we encourage it.
|
This hasn’t been updated in a while so I made some changes inspired by this in 7b85962. |
|
Thanks @gaearon ✌️ |
When I read the installation instructions, it didn't come across to me that the npm package could be used without a CJS module bundler. I tried to reorganize the instructions here to make it a bit more clear.
The rest of the commit msg: