-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Null-safety of generics, varargs and array elements #878
Comments
We are discussing publishing a new null-safety library with JetBrains, that could be a replacement for JSR 305 and provide a solution for generics, varargs and array elements. Any thoughts about the proposal and my remarks on the PR? |
there has been no activity around this in a while |
In fact there has been quite a lot of activity on other channels, I was about to reach you about that. I am part of the https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/ project which intent to provide better null safety annotations than JSR one with generics support. We are coming close to a point where we could test that on Reactor (with checks possible in the build and in Idea). Could you update the status accordingly? |
got it, waiting to hear more from you then 👍 |
I believe the most recent news on this would appear in spring-projects/spring-framework#28797. @sdeleuze do you think we should keep this issue open on our end? Is this an ongoing effort? |
As discussed recently, I am still waiting the opportuntity to discuss with the JSpecify team in order to provide a useful feedback. Should happen in January. |
I shared on spring-projects/spring-framework#28797 (comment) that Spring Framework 7 intends to migrate to JSpecify, I recommend the related version of Reactor to do the same. Happy to provide guidance and support. |
See Kotlin/KEEP#79.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: