Provider property missing from valid license example

[mpdunlop]

license.schema.json defines "provider" as a required property within an LCP license, but the final example in the documentation is missing this property:

{
  "issued":"2013-11-04T01:08:15+01:00",
  "updated":"2014-02-21T09:44:17+01:00",
  "encryption": {
    "content_key": {
      "algorithm": "http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#aes256-cbc",
      "encrypted_value": "/k8RpXqf4E2WEunCp76E8PjhS051NXwAXeTD1ioazYxCRGvHLAck/KQ3cCh5JxDmCK0nRLyAxs1X0aA3z55boQ=="
    },
    "profile": "http://readium.org/lcp/basic-profile",
    "user_key": {
      "algorithm": "http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#sha256",
      "key_check":"jJEjUDipHK3OjGt6kFq7dcOLZuicQFUYwQ+TYkAIWKm6Xv6kpHFhF7LOkUK/Owww",
      "text_hint": "Enter your email address"
    }
  },
  "id": "ef15e740-697f-11e3-949a-0800200c9a66",
  "links": [
    { "rel": "hint",
      "href": "https://www.imaginaryebookretailer.com/lcp/hint",
      "type": "text/html"
    }
  ],  
  "user": {"id": "d9f298a7-7f34-49e7-8aae-4378ecb1d597"},
  "signature": {
    "algorithm": "http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha256",
    "certificate": "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",
    "value": "q/3IInic9c/EaJHyG1Kkqk5v1zlJNsiQBmxz4lykhyD3dA2jg2ZzrOenYU9GxP/xhe5H5Kt2WaJ/hnt8+GWrEx1QOwnNEij5CmIpZ63yRNKnFS5rSRnDMYmQT/fkUYco7BUi7MPPU6OFf4+kaToNWl8m/ZlMxDcS3BZnVhSEKzUNQn1f2y3sUcXjes7wHbImDc6dRthbL/E+assh5HEqakrDuA4lM8XNfukEYQJnivqhqMLOGM33RnS5nZKrPPK/c2F/vGjJffSrlX3W3Jlds0/MZ6wtVeKIugR06c56V6+qKsnMLAQJaeOxxBXmbFdAEyplP9irn4D9tQZKqbbMIw=="
  }
}

Is the property required after signing or should it be omitted?

[HadrienGardeur]

The JSON Schema and spec-language are better source of truth than the examples. IMO, this example should be fixed to contain a provider.