Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editing a RealmList is very difficult #1093

Closed
cmelchior opened this issue Feb 8, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1216
Closed

Editing a RealmList is very difficult #1093

cmelchior opened this issue Feb 8, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1216
Assignees

Comments

@cmelchior
Copy link
Contributor

cmelchior commented Feb 8, 2019

Describe the bug
If you have an object with a RealmList and select that List, it should be possible to edit fields of the elements in that list.

This does work, but only kinda. It looks like the view is somehow eating input events.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Open a RealmList
  2. Left-click on a row (e.g. the Id)
  3. Nothing happens
    4 Left-click anywhere else. Nothing happens. No rows are selected.
  4. Right click on a row. This does appear to highlight the row, and fields on that row can now be edited.
  5. Left-clicking or right-clicking on any other row does not work anymore

Expected behavior
To be able to edit list elements as easy as table elements

Screenshots
image

Versions:

  • OS: Mac
  • Studio Version: 3.3.0

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@kraenhansen
Copy link
Member

kraenhansen commented Nov 26, 2019

@cmelchior - if you have a spare minute, it would be good to know if the change recently released solves the issue from your POV.

@realm realm deleted a comment from RealmBot Nov 28, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants