Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(docs): move from reST to Markdown (#198) #198

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

mdonadoni
Copy link
Member

Convert docs from reStructuredText to Markdown so that the changelog
file is compatible with Release Please.

mdonadoni added a commit to mdonadoni/reana-workflow-engine-serial that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2024
Convert docs from reStructuredText to Markdown so that the changelog
file is compatible with Release Please.
@mdonadoni mdonadoni changed the title refactor(docs): move from reST to Markdown (#441) refactor(docs): move from reST to Markdown (#198) Feb 7, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (a232a76) 28.47% compared to head (7507d12) 28.47%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #198   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.47%   28.47%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         144      144           
=======================================
  Hits           41       41           
  Misses        103      103           

Convert docs from reStructuredText to Markdown so that the changelog
file is compatible with Release Please.
@tiborsimko tiborsimko merged commit 7507d12 into reanahub:master Feb 9, 2024
14 checks passed
@mdonadoni mdonadoni deleted the markdown-changelog branch February 13, 2024 10:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants