You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
After #407 an undocumented behavior regarding annotations meant to extract config map and secret values has been unwillingly changed and needs to be reverted.
The annotations handling mechanism after #407 extracts the whole contents of the config map or secret to the same path where the config map or secret name has been stored (resulting in, for example, .status.secretName.password if .data.password is present in the associated resource) to workaround situations where two services might have a password field within different paths and might get shadowed, whereas before #407 it used to extract the contents to the root of the resulting object (for example, .password), imposing no issue whatsoever because there were only one service being declared in the binding.
After #407 an undocumented behavior regarding annotations meant to extract config map and secret values has been unwillingly changed and needs to be reverted.
The annotations handling mechanism after #407 extracts the whole contents of the config map or secret to the same path where the config map or secret name has been stored (resulting in, for example,
.status.secretName.password
if.data.password
is present in the associated resource) to workaround situations where two services might have apassword
field within different paths and might get shadowed, whereas before #407 it used to extract the contents to the root of the resulting object (for example,.password
), imposing no issue whatsoever because there were only one service being declared in the binding.For reference, see #475 (comment).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: