-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve "Essentials" and "Fundamentals" tutorial instructions and differentiation #4495
Comments
Is there any reason to have these two tutorials in the docs? Fundamentals made sense when we didn't have RTK to apply good abstractions and patterns. Understanding the reasoning was important so folks built a solid foundation for their apps. Now that we provide that out of the box for them, it seems like that is less needed. |
@timdorr : yes, because they target different audiences and have different purposes:
Everyone should go through "Essentials". But there's plenty of people out there who feel like they need to understand how something works before they can successfully use it, and "Fundamentals" is meant to cover that audience. Alternately, someone has gone through "Essentials" and understands the usage patterns, but wants to know why RTK is designed this way and what it's doing for them. So, both useful. |
Maybe "Fundamentals" could be renamed to "internals" or something? 🤔 |
But since we've marked |
It's deprecated because we don't want people actively using it. But the point of the tutorial is to walk people through the pieces that make up Redux, step by step, to help get across all the concepts. It's a "teaching" section, not an "explanation" section: And given that |
Per Laurie Voss:
Further feedback:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: