You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're aware that when the cf-autotick-bot encounters a failure, it can sometimes be a challenging task to debug. The failure can either be silent, such as when the update strategies fail to find a new release, or it can be explicit, like when the feedstock couldn't be updated. In both scenarios, the debugging process can be quite complex due to the scattered information and the intricate behavior of the bot.
Here are a few examples of issues i am describing:
To improve the debugging experience, we're considering the development of a dedicated CLI tool, entry point, or public web app. This tool would utilize the same update logic as the cf-autotick-bot but would be specifically designed to assist maintainers in running the logic for just a single feedstock. The goal is to generate comprehensive debug information to simplify the debugging process, identify failures, and facilitate the application of mitigations by the maintainers themselves.
At present, debugging the bot's logic isn't straightforward, as it's designed to run continuously over all-packages using the cf-graph, rather than in a one-shot fashion.
To address this, we're excited to announce that one of our talented interns will be spearheading this project. The intern will be closely mentored by @xhochy and myself throughout this process. We'll provide guidance and support to ensure the development of an effective solution that will enhance the debugging process.
Please feel free to share any thoughts or suggestions you may have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello everyone,
We're aware that when the cf-autotick-bot encounters a failure, it can sometimes be a challenging task to debug. The failure can either be silent, such as when the update strategies fail to find a new release, or it can be explicit, like when the feedstock couldn't be updated. In both scenarios, the debugging process can be quite complex due to the scattered information and the intricate behavior of the bot.
Here are a few examples of issues i am describing:
boost-cpp
missing version updates #1588python-lmdb
missing update PRs #1498To improve the debugging experience, we're considering the development of a dedicated CLI tool, entry point, or public web app. This tool would utilize the same update logic as the cf-autotick-bot but would be specifically designed to assist maintainers in running the logic for just a single feedstock. The goal is to generate comprehensive debug information to simplify the debugging process, identify failures, and facilitate the application of mitigations by the maintainers themselves.
At present, debugging the bot's logic isn't straightforward, as it's designed to run continuously over all-packages using the cf-graph, rather than in a one-shot fashion.
To address this, we're excited to announce that one of our talented interns will be spearheading this project. The intern will be closely mentored by @xhochy and myself throughout this process. We'll provide guidance and support to ensure the development of an effective solution that will enhance the debugging process.
Please feel free to share any thoughts or suggestions you may have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: