Source data issue: "CCSDS 701.00-R-3 (Red Book)” should just be "CCSDS 701.00-R-3”

[ronaldtse]

https://public.ccsds.org/Publications/SilverBooks.aspx

This document is a Red Book that is later published into a Blue Book. The identifier here is an anomaly because it incorporates the text “ (Red Book)”. Technically, it should only be ""CCSDS 701.00-R-3” as the “R” already says it is a Red Book.

In the actual linked publication: https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/701RB3.pdf , it clearly says the identifier is just “CCSDS 701.00-R-3”.

Proposed action: change identifier "CCSDS 701.00-R-3 (Red Book)” into "CCSDS 701.00-R-3”.

[andrew2net]

@ronaldtse the type is "Silver Book". Shouldn't the ID be "CCSDS 701.00-R-3-S"?

[ronaldtse]

@andrew2net yes you're right. This is now a silver book so it should be "CCSDS 701.00-R-3-S".

[ronaldtse]

Reported to CCSDS.

[ronaldtse]

CCSDS reported this fixed. Thanks!

Ping @mico @andrew2net .

[andrew2net]

@andrew2net yes you're right. This is now a silver book so it should be "CCSDS 701.00-R-3-S".

@ronaldtse it should be "CCSDS 701.00-R-3-S" but it's "CCSDS 701.00-R-3" now.

[ronaldtse]

@andrew2net reported:

CCSDS 701.00-R-3 is a Silver Book

https://public.ccsds.org/Publications/SilverBooks.aspx

On the Silver Books page, the “CCSDS 701.00-R-3” entry was corrected (the “(Red Book)” suffix was removed), but is now missing the “-S” suffix at the end since it is now a Silver Book.

Proposed action: Rename "CCSDS 701.00-R-3” => "CCSDS 701.00-R-3-S"