Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feedback on script arsenal #3

Open
deadeert opened this issue Dec 29, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Feedback on script arsenal #3

deadeert opened this issue Dec 29, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@deadeert
Copy link

deadeert commented Dec 29, 2020

Hello guys,

I tried your tool on couple of equipments. I have to say it works pretty well.
As feedback:

  • for the nmap tool, to clarify the use, may be add switch arguments recv_canid and send_canid.
  • for the nmap tool, a switch can be added to indicate if session or service should be scanned.
  • for the nmap tool, while indicating discovered service, return code information (bad session, wrong format) could be added. ex:
    [Thread 98192 - 1609242551.062]scan.services discovered 22 Read Data By Identifier : wrongFormat
    [Thread 98192 - 1609242551.063]scan.services discovered 2e Write Data By Identifier: wrongSession.

I think it will help using your tool, especially for non advanced users.

Having scripts to perform readDID / readDTC / writeDID / openSession / ... will help them al lot too. I don't know if the format is standardized or if it change according to the supplier.

thanks for having release such a tool, really handy.

@deadeert
Copy link
Author

I can do a PR for the first three points.
But have no more access to UDS ISO so cannot implement properly the other requested features.

@deadeert
Copy link
Author

Did a PR for the main topic.
#4

@eledisez
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

sorry for the late response.

Thanks for the feed-back, it's always a great pleasure and it's good to hear that the tool is useful.

Your PR actually improve the usage, thanks ! We will see to integrate it quickly.

I will check what we have about readDID / readDTC / writeDID ... it seems to me that these are commands are standards.

Erwan.

@deadeert
Copy link
Author

Hi there, no problem, it is a very small PR, not a big deal.
Let me know if I can help for the DID stuff..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants