Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build fails with musl target #14

Closed
opensourcegeek opened this issue Aug 4, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

build fails with musl target #14

opensourcegeek opened this issue Aug 4, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@opensourcegeek
Copy link

When I run cargo build --target i686-unknown-linux-musl I get the following error

error[E0463]: can't find crate for proc_macro
--> /home/opensourcegeek/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/proc-macro-hack-0.3.3/src/lib.rs:159:1
|
159 | extern crate proc_macro;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ can't find crate

Seems like proc-macro-hack depends on proc_macro crate - I cannot find it in crates.io, there is only proc-macro2. I'm not sure how the build works fine on gnu target, I'll dig more but thought I'll report here as well.

@rushmorem
Copy link
Member

rushmorem commented Aug 4, 2017

Which version of rustc are you running? We currently test on v1.17.0 and above but the proc_macro crate should be available from v1.15.0 IIRC.

Edit: We don't test against the musl target though...

@rushmorem
Copy link
Member

@opensourcegeek According to dtolnay/proc-macro-hack#6 (comment) we need to disable default-features for proc-macro-hack to fix this.

@opensourcegeek
Copy link
Author

@rushmorem Thanks - I've forked the project and disabled default features and it seems to work.

@rushmorem
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the feedback. I'm reopening since the fix hasn't been applied to this repo yet. Mind submitting a pull request with your changes?

@rushmorem rushmorem reopened this Aug 15, 2017
@rushmorem
Copy link
Member

Now fixed in version 0.0.10.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants