Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Sorry probably should have opened a discussion - forgot about that :) This is more of a discussion than any issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I'd be totally fine switching to JDK11 as the minimum requirement. I don't know enough about OSGi to have an opinion on how this affects things, though. My opinion would be to go ahead and push those changes to the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I believe we are starting to rock the boat on what we can do here with jdk 8 to jdk 11 jump. I'm going to release jsdt-core as it is on master to pick up in latest formatter plugin release but problem we face post this point is that the osgi libraries are jdk 11 required now. Since we are taking jars here from some source and rebundling, its highly probable we are getting something in that 30mb that is really compiled to java 11 and it probably would be hard for us to detect. I don't know how much javascript actually changes in eclipse anyways so maybe its not a huge concern and we just sit where we are. In light of this, I will push up a jdk11 branch only to house what was needed to change until we can further think about this.
Of a personal note, in my day job working over 500 repos, we have roughly 85% of them all building only with jdk 11 regardless of their runtime but I'm not convienced yet doing that jump would be good for us here and we need to discuss that more on the formatter itself.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions