Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why did you not use Naives bayes? #28

Open
vanditj opened this issue Oct 16, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

why did you not use Naives bayes? #28

vanditj opened this issue Oct 16, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@vanditj
Copy link

vanditj commented Oct 16, 2017

it rejects the point of overfitting and gives 93% accuracy

@rhiever
Copy link
Owner

rhiever commented Oct 16, 2017

What project is this question for?

@rhiever
Copy link
Owner

rhiever commented Oct 16, 2017

Oh, I see. I used tree-based algorithms there because they're good default algorithms to use (--> not much need for data preprocessing), have good performance, and are easy to tune.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants