Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider Moving from {{ playbook_dir }} to {{ inventory_dir }} #261

Closed
sherl0cks opened this issue Mar 14, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #265
Closed

Consider Moving from {{ playbook_dir }} to {{ inventory_dir }} #261

sherl0cks opened this issue Mar 14, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #265

Comments

@sherl0cks
Copy link
Contributor

If distribute Labs CI/CD via galaxy, moving to inventory dir would allow consumers to write playbooks like the one found in #260 , instead of requiring Labs CI/CD to maintain such playbooks. This would allow consumers to reuse our inventory (and its excellent filter tagging), reducing their maintenance overhead.

@sherl0cks
Copy link
Contributor Author

@oybed
Copy link
Contributor

oybed commented Mar 14, 2019

+100
We have always promoted using inventory_dir as part of openshift-applier work, and it is reflected in all the original openshift-applier and most of CoP work as well + it is also in the applier tests

@sherl0cks
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just spoke with @pcarney8 . He is OK with moving to inventory dir. I will send a PR for this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants