-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dorling option for proportional symbols #77
Comments
I have a first almost complete implementation (the simulation is restarted if the user changes the cartographic projection but I still have some details to fix to restart the simulation when the user changes the symbol size or the symbol border size) What do you think about not asking for the number of iterations when creating the layer (and that this number can then be modified in the layer properties popup)? Layer creation options : Layer properties popup : |
Ok with that |
Ok for me + we should add a reference to the algorithm in documentation (that explain iterations). |
Yes sure ! I chose not to refer to Dorling / Demers here (to have the same "avoid overlap" setting for square and circle and to avoid needing special cartographic knowledge when the user just wants to "avoid overlaps") and save that for the documentation. However we could already have some info about this in a tooltip (so that the user knows that increasing the number of iterations is supposed to improve the result)? |
That would be great. |
add Dorling option for maps with proportional symbols, to avoid overlapping > would require an additional parameter (number of iterations)
![magrit2](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17565776/177562456-3fd4899e-d73a-4209-a79c-ec92f33e3404.PNG)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: