Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jemalloc vs mallocng benchmarking? #4

Closed
brainstorm opened this issue Aug 12, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

jemalloc vs mallocng benchmarking? #4

brainstorm opened this issue Aug 12, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@brainstorm
Copy link

I've just noticed that this allocator got switched on by default on MUSL 1.2.1 and will test it soon enough with AWS lambdas (eager to see a 1.0.0 release on musl-cross-make?) :)

Have you run some (rudimentary?) benchmarks vs jemalloc and others to compare?

@brainstorm
Copy link
Author

jemalloc bench code: jemalloc/jemalloc@753bbf1

@jvoisin
Copy link

jvoisin commented Nov 20, 2021

Done via daanx/mimalloc-bench#55 :)

@brainstorm
Copy link
Author

Cool! have you run those and have some plots/numbers to share? :)

@jvoisin
Copy link

jvoisin commented Nov 20, 2021

Data should show up at https://github.com/daanx/mimalloc-bench/runs/4273418609?check_suite_focus=true in a couple of minutes if everything goes well.

@brainstorm
Copy link
Author

According to elapsed_time from https://github.com/daanx/mimalloc-bench/runs/4273418609?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:881 ... malloc-ng performs quite badly compared to the others? :-S

@jvoisin
Copy link

jvoisin commented Nov 20, 2021

Absolutely :/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants