Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RIP-003: Composite NFTs #4

Open
Swader opened this issue Dec 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

RIP-003: Composite NFTs #4

Swader opened this issue Dec 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
RIP RMRK Improvement Proposal

Comments

@Swader
Copy link
Contributor

Swader commented Dec 27, 2020

RIP Summary

This RIP proposes a standard upgrade to allow for composite (layered) NFTs and custom collections.

RIP Details

This proposal aims to introduce tie-ins between NFTs that make them influence each other, and aims to introduce a new entity - custom collections - which allow users to create new collections of interdependent art the properties of which affect the greater whole.

NFT Dependencies

A user can make an NFT have other NFTs as dependencies, and can define certain properties of the NFT as affected by properties of its dependencies.

TBD

Custom Collections

A user is able to create a custom view collection which is composed of other NFTs. This collection is an NFT itself and can be traded.

TBD

Mutable Properties

To make the above possible, mutable properties are introduced - simple strings and switches an NFT's owner can flip and change. These changes propagate up the chain of dependents.

TBD

Examples

TBD

Open Questions

TBD

Prior work (optional)

  • Async Art has done some experiments in the layered NFT space where certain NFTs are rendered as part of a collection and the changed properties of one NFT are reflected in the collection being viewed.

Impact

This is a major change due to new entities being introduced, so a major version bump is recommended.

@Swader Swader added the RIP RMRK Improvement Proposal label Dec 27, 2020
@Swader
Copy link
Contributor Author

Swader commented Jun 27, 2021

Will be closed in #27

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RIP RMRK Improvement Proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant