-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement FT and IMU sensors #7
Comments
I'm pasting here the lines added by Gerson, for better visibility.
|
FT/IMU plugins need to take care of the new wrapping method as previously covered in #6 for motor control and cameras. See robotology/gazebo-yarp-plugins#586. |
I'm following the 1.6 sensor specs defined here. Note I am adjusting the IMU orientation frame via |
The Gazebo-YARP plugin requires some tweaks in order to overcome the frame orientation issue. In robotology/gazebo-yarp-plugins#639 I'm proposing a new |
Done at ff74a2c. I had to split the terminal hand/foot link models in order to place an intermediate fixed joint for the corresponding FT sensor plugin. The masses are just estimates (0.45 kg for the LacqueyFetch, which is somewhat accurate, and 1 kg for the feet) and the inertias have not been adjusted post-split, so those values need to be reviewed at some point. Notable collateral changes:
Note the unmerged commit 8532631 remains pending review of robotology/gazebo-yarp-plugins#639. (edit: this is no longer necessary, the new default behavior matches our expectations regarding how the IMU works) |
Luís prepared a modified TEO model including force-torque sensors: roboticslab-uc3m/teo-main#51. Review and upload them here. I recall that the placement was not ideal, i.e. we had to add a dummy link or whatever. Perhaps there is a better way?
Follow-up to #1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: