Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add wholebodydynamics device configuration files for all robots with a modern CPU in icub-head #202

Open
traversaro opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@traversaro
Copy link
Member

traversaro commented Nov 3, 2020

For all iCub with a modern CPU in the head, we should be able to provide wholebodydynamics device (i.e. the device available in https://github.com/robotology/whole-body-estimators/pulls) xml files such as the one that are available for iCubGenova02 and iCubGenova04 . First of all, we should be able to get a list of the iCubs with modern CPUs.

@traversaro
Copy link
Member Author

traversaro commented Nov 3, 2020

Based on the analysis of internal documents, I think that the robots that do not have a pc104 but instead a modern icub-head in the robot head (and for this reason are suited for having a wholebodydynamics-device running insede the main yarprobotinterface instance) are:

YARP_ROBOT_NAME wholebodydynamics conf files are already present? Notes
iCubGenova02
iCubDarmstadt01
iCubGenova04
iCubNottingham01
iCubSheffield01 No legs.
iCubHeidelberg01 Only torso and legs.
iCubTwente01
iCubErzelli01
iCubErzelli02
iCubLausanne02
iCubNancy01
iCubChemnitz01 Head + Right arm
iCubSingapore01
iCubGenova07
iCubMoscow01
iCubShenzhen01
iCubHongKong01
iCubGenova08

The nice thing is that, beside the "strange" robots that only have a subset of the limbs, for all the others the wholebodydynamics.xml file can be exactly the same.

Note this info are tentative are should be confirmed.
Thanks @Fabrizio69 for the precious info.

@traversaro
Copy link
Member Author

According to @Fabrizio69 , iCubHeildeberg01 still uses an old pc104 board, so for now I removed it from the list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants