-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
organization chart for rocker image universe #385
Comments
Is this what you are looking for? https://www.rocker-project.org/images/ Mostly it's the versioned stack that has a lot of vertical stacking. We're working on a way to make that both more transparent and more user-configurable. |
Thank you @cboettig. I had in mind that I saw a image showing it as a chart for quick insight whichone to chose. On the site you mentioned (which I was on already before) is said, that the shiny image is build on r-base. But as far as I know there is a version tag for shiny or especially for shiny-verse image. So as I understand there is a versioned shiny branch which has extending images. Can you point out in which of your images rstudio(-server) and shiny(-server) is included or can be included via BUILD ARG? (Possibly this is the question I origionally want to answer) Thank you! :-) |
@Pit-Storm yeah, good catch, the info for shiny is out of date.
As you can probably tell, both of these examples (adding tidyverse to the shiny stack, adding shiny to the r-ver / rstudio stack) show the limits of the current vertical stack that we're trying to address with a more modular build system in the (work in progress!) stuff over at https://github.com/rocker-org/rocker-versioned2. The plan is for that to come with some new documentation etc to also make this a bit less of a pain to figure out than it is currently. unfortunately the covid-19 thing isn't helping our development effort at this time, but stay tuned. |
Thanks for that great answer. Now it is completly clear.
I will check the versioned2 repo for further insights what is coming soon. Do you mind for contribution in that (ewrly) stage of that repo?
… Am 27.03.2020 um 17:36 schrieb Carl Boettiger ***@***.***>:
@Pit-Storm yeah, good catch, the info for shiny is out of date.
rocker/shiny is built on rocker/r-ver, rocker/shiny-verse extends rocker/shiny 'manually'. You can see all this just by looking at the Dockerfile for the image e.g, https://hub.docker.com/r/rocker/shiny-verse/dockerfile, though I know it's not great.
The rocker versioned stack has the ability to add shiny-server to the instances that already have rstudio server: https://github.com/rocker-org/rocker-versioned/tree/master/rstudio#add-shiny-server-on-start-up-with-e-addshiny So this applies to rocker/rstudio and up that stack (tidyverse, verse, geospatial, ml, binder).
As you can probably tell, both of these examples (adding tidyverse to the shiny stack, adding shiny to the r-ver / rstudio stack) show the limits of the current vertical stack that we're trying to address with a more modular build system in the (work in progress!) stuff over at https://github.com/rocker-org/rocker-versioned2. The plan is for that to come with some new documentation etc to also make this a bit less of a pain to figure out than it is currently.
unfortunately the covid-19 thing isn't helping our development effort at this time, but stay tuned.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Hi Folks,
at first: Thank your for your great work! This saves a lot of time to us :-)
I was wondering where there is a organization chart which shows which image is made out of which other one. So that one can see, which to choose for the specific use case.
I know there had been one, but I'm not able to find it anymore.
Thanks for your help and kind regards :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: