Static and dynamic plugins for old flexbox are not equivalent

[necolas]

The static plugin for old flexbox is missing some of the features of the dynamic plugin, which means it doesn't provide the same browser compatibility

[robinweser]

Do you have detailed information, which parts are missing?
The default static prefixer is configured to support IE >= 11, so e.g. die IE flexbox fixes are not included in the default static version. The dynamic prefixer on the other hand checks the browser version via user-agent, so it might still add the IE stuff if an IE < 11 is provided.

You can also create your own static version with a different browser version range (see the docs).
If apart from that, inconsistence still exists, I am more than happy to fix it :P

[necolas]

@lyahdav patched the missing flexGrow in the plugin in this branch https://github.com/lyahdav/inline-style-prefixer/commits/3.0.8-flexbox-old-fixes. Comparing the plugins suggests there may be some other differences in the old flexbox compatibility offered

[lyahdav]

Yup, the change I made in my fork was needed to support Android < 4.4 browser. Also I had to use the dynamic prefixer instead of static because of other things that are missing from the static prefixer flexboxOld plugin.

[robinweser]

Can anybody elaborate on missing differences that should be added as well? Going to release some fixes soon and want to add those!

[lyahdav]

Take a look at this branch on my fork: https://github.com/lyahdav/inline-style-prefixer/commits/3.0.8-flexbox-old-fixes

Also compare the flexboxOld plugin under static vs dynamic folders in your main repo.

[robinweser]

Alright, I just added those changes as well. Next time, I'd appreciate a PR to add that directly 🙈

[robinweser]

Just released 4.0.2 including those changes :)