Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change type of ESLint config and add ESLint Stylistic #247

Closed
ansivgit opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #287
Closed

Change type of ESLint config and add ESLint Stylistic #247

ansivgit opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #287
Assignees
Labels
feature New feature or request high priority

Comments

@ansivgit
Copy link
Collaborator

📝 Describe the feature

To make it easier to switch to the latest version of ESLint in the future, we are changing the type of ESLint config to flat config and adding ESLint Stylistic to maintain quality control of the code style at the highest level.

ℹ️ Additional context

This task is subtask of #101

✅ Definition of Done (DoD):

  • change type of ESLint config to flat config;
  • add ESLint Stylistic to our packages;
  • add rules for stricter code style;
  • check that everything is working correctly.
@ansivgit ansivgit added the feature New feature or request label May 30, 2024
@ansivgit ansivgit added this to RS Site May 30, 2024
@ansivgit ansivgit moved this to Backlog in RS Site May 30, 2024
@ansivgit ansivgit self-assigned this May 30, 2024
@ansivgit ansivgit moved this from Backlog to In Progress in RS Site May 30, 2024
@ansivgit ansivgit moved this from In Progress to Peer review in RS Site Jun 11, 2024
@ansivgit ansivgit moved this from Peer review to Review in RS Site Jun 13, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review to Done in RS Site Jun 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request high priority
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant