You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is based on agile user stories, but I added a more dedicated description of the user and his industrial problem/use case, so we know where the story comes from.
High level comment: any time there is the option to list multiple items (such as for User type), I'd suggest using an actual list, or use comma separation. Or change markup such that robotics end-user and the other options are clearly distinguishable from the "and". It's not easy right now to scan the file.
Did you also want to create something to capture missing features / functionality / problems?
High level comment: any time there is the option to list multiple items (such as for User type), I'd suggest using an actual list, or use comma separation. Or change markup such that robotics end-user and the other options are clearly distinguishable from the "and". It's not easy right now to scan the file.
Good point on machine processing.
Did you also want to create something to capture missing features / functionality / problems?
I suppose we could have a list of necessary technologies/features/functionalities for the user stories.
It wouldn't need to be this extensively structured or complex, but YAML is still human readable, allows free-form text (in certain special fields) and would make this immediately machine readable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: