Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added atomic_configure_file function to catkin #566

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2013

Conversation

wjwwood
Copy link
Member

@wjwwood wjwwood commented Dec 21, 2013

Also made catkin use it in a few places. This was done to prevent errors when building multiple catkin packages into the same devel space in parallel.

@wjwwood
Copy link
Member Author

wjwwood commented Dec 21, 2013

This is related to #330.

@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@
#
# @public
#
include(${catkin_EXTRAS_DIR}/atomic_configure_file.cmake)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of including the file in multiple location please add it to the global list of included files: https://github.com/ros/catkin/blob/groovy-devel/cmake/all.cmake#L100

@wjwwood
Copy link
Member Author

wjwwood commented Dec 23, 2013

Ok, I addressed each of the concerns.

Also made catkin use it in a few places. This was
done to prevent errors when building multiple
catkin packages into the same devel space in
parallel.
@wjwwood
Copy link
Member Author

wjwwood commented Dec 23, 2013

Squashed.

@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member

+1

dirk-thomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2013
added atomic_configure_file function to catkin
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas merged commit 15dcaee into groovy-devel Dec 23, 2013
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas deleted the atomic_configure_file branch December 23, 2013 21:22
cwecht pushed a commit to cwecht/catkin that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants