-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
Copy pathabdelwhab_10_simultaneous_800983.pdf.txt
722 lines (617 loc) · 34.9 KB
/
abdelwhab_10_simultaneous_800983.pdf.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Simultaneous detection and differentiation by multiplex real time RT-PCR of highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5N1 classic (clade 2.2.1 proper) and escape mutant (clade 2.2.1 variant) lineages in Egypt</title>
<meta name="Subject" content="Virology Journal 2010 7:260. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-7-260"/>
<meta name="Author" content="El-Sayed M Abdelwhab"/>
<meta name="Creator" content="Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher 10.0.1082/W Unicode"/>
<meta name="Producer" content="Acrobat Distiller 9.0.0 (Windows)"/>
<meta name="CreationDate" content=""/>
</head>
<body>
<pre>
Abdelwhab et al. Virology Journal 2010, 7:260
http://www.virologyj.com/content/7/1/260
METHODOLOGY
Open Access
Simultaneous detection and differentiation by
multiplex real time RT-PCR of highly pathogenic
avian influenza subtype H5N1 classic (clade 2.2.1
proper) and escape mutant (clade 2.2.1 variant)
lineages in Egypt
El-Sayed M Abdelwhab1,2,3, Ahmed M Erfan2, Christian Grund1, Mario Ziller1, Abdel-Satar Arafa2, Martin Beer1,
Mona M Aly2, Hafez M Hafez3, Timm C Harder1*
Abstract
Background: The endemic status of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) of subtype H5N1 in Egypt
continues to devastate the local poultry industry and poses a permanent threat for human health. Several
genetically and antigenically distinct H5N1 lineages co-circulate in Egypt: Strains of clade 2.2.1 proper replicate
mainly in backyard birds causing the bulk of human infections, while a variant lineage within 2.2.1 (2.2.1v) appears
to be perpetuated mainly in commercial poultry farms in Egypt. Viruses of the 2.2.1v lineage represent drift variants
escaping from conventional vaccine-induced immunity and some of these strains also escaped detection by
commercial real time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) protocols due to mismatches in the primers/probe
binding sites.
Results: We developed therefore a versatile, sensitive and lineage-specific multiplex RT-qPCR for detection and
typing of H5N1 viruses in Egypt. Analytical characterization was carried out using 50 Egyptian HPAIV H5N1 strains
isolated since 2006 and 45 other avian influenza viruses (AIV). A detection limit of 400 cRNA copies per ml sample
matrix was found. Higher diagnostic sensitivity of the multiplex assay in comparison to other generic H5 or M-gene
based RT-qPCR assays were found by examination of 63 swab samples from experimentally infected chickens and
50 AIV-positive swab samples from different host species in the field in Egypt.
Conclusions: The new multiplex RT-qPCR assay could be useful for rapid high-throughput monitoring for the
presence of HPAIV H5N1 in commercial poultry in Egypt. It may also aid in prospective epidemiological studies to
further delineate and better control spread of HPAIV H5N1 in Egypt.
Background
The incursion of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus
(HPAIV) of subtype H5N1 of phlyogenetic clade 2.2,
subclade 2.2.1 [1], into Egypt in 2005/2006 caused
severe economic losses in the commercial (previous
total annual production of 850 million birds) and backyard sectors (250 million birds) of poultry production in
this country [2]. The virus also possesses considerable
* Correspondence: timm.harder@fli.bund.de
1
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
zoonotic potential. Human cases of HPAIV H5N1 infection, characterized by a high fatality rate, started to
occur due to virus exposure of humans at the poultryhuman interface which is highly fissured in Egypt [3]. In
order to restore poultry production capacities and to
mitigate risks of an emergence of new virus variants
with increased pandemic potential in the human population, efforts to control HPAIV H5N1 were given a high
priority [4].
Despite intense control measures including blanket
vaccination, surveillance and depopulation of infected
© 2010 Abdelwhab et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abdelwhab et al. Virology Journal 2010, 7:260
http://www.virologyj.com/content/7/1/260
poultry holdings, HPAI H5N1 has gained endemic status
in Egyptian poultry populations [5] and continuous,
year-round circulation of HPAI H5N1 virus has been
reported [6-8]. This is at least in part due to the highly
divergent evolution of H5N1 viruses in Egypt which
seems to be accelerated and shaped by vaccine-induced
selection pressure leading to the emergence of genetically and antigenically distinct viruses [9]. Strains of the
parent subclade 2.2.1 proper (2.2.1p) are reported to circulate nationwide mainly in unvaccinated birds, particularly waterfowl from backyard holdings [7]. The vast
majority of human infections (34 fatalities out of 109
infected cases until 22nd June 2010 [10]) is attributable
to viruses of this group. Since 2007, viruses of a variant sublineage emerged from clade 2.2.1. These
viruses, which will here be referred to as lineage 2.2.1v,
originated from and circulate predominantly in vaccinated commercial chickens [8]. These antigenically
drifted strains were shown to escape immunity induced
by standard H5 vaccination and are prevalent mainly
in Lower Egypt, particularly in the Nile Delta
[7,8,11,12]. Knowledge of the epidemiology, especially
the transmission pathways, of those two lineages
between commercial farms, backyard birds, feral birds
and humans is incomplete but urgently required to
improve control measures. So far, assignment of
viruses to either lineage requires virus isolation and
antigenic characterization by hemagglutination inhibition or sequencing and molecular analysis. No rapid
typing tools are currently available.
A number of RT-qPCR assays for diagnosis and characterization with respect to subtype and pathogenicity of
HPAIV H5N1 have been published. These assays target
the matrix gene [13,14], the nucleoprotein gene [15,16],
the neuraminidase and the hemagglutinin [17-23]. Egypt’s
surveillance program embarked on the H5-specific
RT-qPCR assay [23], which is recommended by the
World Organization of Animal Health (OIE). The assay
was initially highly successful in detecting H5N1 infections in Egypt [5,7]. Since 2007, however, an increasing
number of strains in Egypt escaping detection by this
assay was reported [24]. Therefore, the aim of this study
was to develop a sensitive multiplex RT-qPCR able to
detect all HPAIV H5N1 variants of clade 2.2 currently
circulating in Egypt and, simultaneously, to distinguish
between conventional 2.2.1p strains and the 2.2.1v lineage of vaccine-driven escape variants.
Results
A multiplex RT-qPCR assay was designed to detect
HPAIV H5N1 viruses and simultaneously differentiate
the main two major lineages circulating in Egypt; classic
2.2.1p viruses and the newly evolving clade 2.2.1v of
antigenically drifted variant viruses. A single reaction
Page 2 of 8
assay using multiplexed primers and probes (three colours) was developed. Analytical characterization of the
assay was carried out using 50 Egyptian HPAIV H5N1
strains and other avian pathogens. Diagnostic performance was examined with 63 swab samples from
experimentally infected chickens and 50 avian influenza
virus (AIV)-positive swab samples obtained from different host species in the field in Egypt.
Real-Time RT-PCR optimization
Two strategies were combined to sensitively detect and
distinguish viruses of clade 2.2.1p from 2.2.1v escape
strains (Figure 1). Lineage-specific primers had disparate
nucleotides at their most 3’-positions whereas lineage
specific-probes were distinguished by two nucleotide
positions towards the centre of the probe. Locked
nucleotide chemistry was used to further increase the
specificity of certain probes. Optimization runs were
carried out using log10 dilution series of RNA extracted
from A/chicken/Egypt/0879-NLQP/2008 (clade 2.2.1v),
A/chicken/Egypt/NLQP-0918Q/2009 (clade 2.2.1p) and
A/Whooper swan/Germany/R65/2006 (European clade 2.2)
(data not shown). The concentration of primers and
probes was optimized to increase the efficiency and sensitivity of amplification to final values shown in table 1.
The lowest Ct values and highest ΔR n values for the
multiplex RT-qPCR were observed using the following
thermoprofile and the SuperScript III RT/Platinum Taq
Mix chemistry: 30 min at 50°C and 2 min at 94°C, then
42 cycles of 94°C, 56°C and 68°C for 30 seconds each.
No significant differences in sensitivity were evident
when running the three RT-qPCRs separately indicating
that the multiplex approach produced no relevant detrimental effects on amplification efficacy (data not
shown).
Analytical characteristics
The current protocol was found to have a detection
limit of approximately 2 - 5 RNA copies/reaction which
amounts to 400 - 1000 copies per ml sample matrix
when using cRNA as a copy-based standard. The dynamic
ranges of target detection are summarized in figure 2.
A total of 50 HPAIV H5N1 isolates from Egypt obtained
between 2006 and 2010 for which nucleotide sequences of
the HA gene were available, were examined by the multiplex assay which assigned 33 of them to clade 2.2.1p
(HEX-positive) whereas 15 isolates reacted like 2.2.1v
strains (FAM-positive) (Additional file 1, Table S1). An
exactly similar clustering was achieved for these strains in
a phylogenetic analysis based on full length HA sequences
(7, 8 and Additional file 1, Table S1). In addition, two isolates reacted positive for both 2.2.1p and 2.2.1v lineages.
All 50 isolates were also detected by the ROX probe of the
multiplex RT-qPCR (Additional file 1, Table S1). For 40
Abdelwhab et al. Virology Journal 2010, 7:260
http://www.virologyj.com/content/7/1/260
Page 3 of 8
Figure 1 Localization of primers and probes. Localization of primers and probes as mentioned in table 1 along the HA gene is depicted. Two
target regions (P1, P2) were chosen. Primers and probes were selected with specificity for the HA of Egyptian HPAIV H5N1 viruses either of
lineage 2.2.1p (proper) or 2.2.1v (variant). Triangles (2.2.1p) and squares (2.2.1v) distinguish nucleotide positions specific for either lineage.
Labelling of hydrolysis probes was with FAM (F, 2.2.1v), HEX (H, 2.2.1p) or ROX (2.2.1p+v).
isolates a comparison with the generic H5 RT-qPCR validated by Slomka et al. [23] was performed showing markedly lower Ct values, corresponding to a higher sensitivity,
for the ROX probe assay.
In addition, several, but not all, non-Egyptian H5
viruses could also be detected by the multiplex RT-qPCR
with equal or slightly lower sensitivity compared to the
generic H5 protocol described by Slomka et al. [23].
Negative results (no measurable Ct obtained [> > 40])
were generated with all non-H5 AI viruses as well as with
other avian viral or bacterial pathogens (Additional file 2,
Table S2).
Diagnostic performance
Swab samples (n = 63) originating from SPF chickens
which were experimentally infected with A/chicken/Egypt/
0879-NLQP/2008 (clade 2.2.1v) or A/chicken/Egypt/
NLQP-0918Q/2009 (clade 2.2.1p) were examined by the
multiplex RT-qPCR and compared to Ct values obtained
with an H5-specific assay described by Slomka et al. [23].
Results are shown in Additional file 3, Table S3, and Figure 3. Swabs collected from individual birds were selected
on basis of Ct values obtained by a generic M gene-targeted RT-qPCR (14, not shown) so as to represent a wide
range of samples with low to high concentrations of AIV
RNA. Special emphasis was put on samples with Ct-values
around 35. The multiplex assay assigned the correct lineage within clade 2.2.1 for all samples. One sample (#15,
Additional file 3, Table S3) yielded a weak false-positive
signal (Ct 39.03) in the 2.2.1v specific assay although the
sample came from a chicken that was infected by a 2.2.1p
proper virus. However, upon repeated RNA extraction and
Table 1 Oligonucleotide primers and probes designed for this study
No.
1
Primers/probes
P1FW_2.2.1p
Sequence 5’- 3’
GAR TCA ATA GGA AYT TAC CAA ATA CTG
Conc.1 (nM)
Position2
400
1615-1641
2
P1FW_2.2.1v
GAA TCA ATA GGA ACT TAC CAA ATA CTA TC
800
1615-1643
3
P1RV_2.2.1
AGA CCA GCC ACC ATT GAT TGC
400
1699-1679
4
5
PRO1.1_2.2.1v
PRO1.2_2.2.1p
FAM-ACA GTG GCA AGT TCC CT-BHQ-1
HEX-ACA GTG GCG AGC TCC CTA GC-BHQ-1
64
64
Amplificate size (bp)
1654-1670
1652-1675
6
P2FW_2.2.1p
GGA TTC ACC ATC CRA ATG ATGC
1600
620-641
7
P2FW_2.2.1v
GGG ATT CAC CAT CCA AAT GAT GA
1600
619-641
8
P2RV_2.2.1p
CCG TTT ACC TTA GAT CTA GTA GCT ATT
1600
752-726
9
P2RV_2.2.1v
CCG TTT ACC TTA GAT CTA GTR GCT ATC
1600
752-726
10
PRO2_2.2.1
ROX -TAC CTA TAT TTC CGT TGG GAC ATC AAC ACT AAA-BHQ-2
64
85
675-707
106
Nanomolar concentration of a 25 μl reaction.
2
Position relative to the initiating codon of A/chicken/Egypt/06541-NLQP/2006 (H5N1), GenBank accession no. EU372946.1.
Bold face nucleotides indicate mismatch positions between clade 2.2.1p proper and lineage 2.2.1v variant viruses. Italics indicate use of locked nucleic acid
nucleotides.
The specificity of primers and probes for either or both of the 2.2.1 lineages is indicated with their designation.
1
Abdelwhab et al. Virology Journal 2010, 7:260
http://www.virologyj.com/content/7/1/260
Page 4 of 8
Figure 2 Detection limits and amplification efficiency. Detection limits and amplification efficiency of the multiplex RT-qPCR for detection
and differentiation of clade 2.2.1p proper and 2.2.1v variant HPAIV H5N1 strains from Egypt using cRNA as a copy-based target. The standard
curves were established by up to five independent runs. Average Ct values and variations are plotted against the cRNA copy numbers.
analysis of the sample, this false-positive reaction was not
reproducible which indicates a possible spill-over contamination possibly during the previous extraction procedure.
No significant differences in Ct values were evident
between the 2.2.1p specific assay (HEX) of the multiplex
RT-qPCR and the Slomka H5 RT-qPCRs (Figure 3a).
However, both the 2.2.1v specific assay (FAM) and the
new Egyptian H5.specific assay (ROX) of the multiplex
mixture were significantly more sensitive (p = 0,027 and p
≤ 0,001) than the generic H5 RT-qPCR (Figures 3b-c).
Oropharyngeal or cloacal swabs were also sampled in
commercial farms (n = 11) and backyard poultry holdings (n = 39) in Egypt. A total of 50 samples pretested
by M-specific RT-qPCR [14] to be positive for AIV was
examined using the H5 multiplex RT-qPCR assay and
the generic H5 protocol [23]. The multiplex RT-qPCR
found all 50 samples positive for subtype H5 (ROX).
Among them, 32 were assigned to clade 2.2.1p and
15 to lineage 2.2.1v (Additional file 4, Table S4, and
figure 4) while three samples were positive for both.
Only 45 samples tested positive in the generic H5 RTqPCR using the original protocol by Slomka et al. [23],
and on average the Ct values produced with the newly
developed multiplex assay were significantly lower (p <
< 0,001) than those obtained in both the M and the H5
generic RT-qPCRs (Figures 4a-c).
Discussion
We report here the development of a multiplex RTqPCR assay for detection and differentiation of Egyptian
H5N1 HPAI viruses of clade 2.2.1 proper (p) and the
emerging 2.2.1 lineage of viruses which escape standard
vaccine-induced immunity (designated here 2.2.1v). The
assay was shown to have a detection limit of 2-5 cRNA
copies per reaction. Based on a phylogenetic analysis of
50 isolates tested [7,8], the assay is fully specific with
regard to assigning the Egyptian H5N1 isolates to either
phylogenetic cluster. No unspecific reactivity with either
Abdelwhab et al. Virology Journal 2010, 7:260
http://www.virologyj.com/content/7/1/260
Page 5 of 8
Figure 3 Diagnostic performance characteristics (experimental infections). Diagnostic performance characteristics of a newly developed
H5-specific multiplex RT-qPCR for detection and differentiation of clade 2.2.1p proper and 2.2.1v variant HPAIV H5N1 strains from Egypt
compared to standard H5 RT-qPCR (Slomka et al. [20]). The analysis comprises swab samples obtained from SPF chickens after experimental
infection with A/chicken/Egypt/0879-NLQP/2008 (clade 2.2.1v, open triangles, n = 34 samples) or A/chicken/Egypt/NLQP-0918Q/2009 (clade
2.2.1p, black triangles, n = 29 samples). See Additional file 3, Table S3, for individual values. Grey dots represent samples in which both clades
were detected. X-axis: Ct-values obtained by the generic H5 RT-qPCR [20]. Y-axis: Ct-values generated by the specific component of the multiplex
RT-qPCR as indicated above each graph.
Figure 4 Diagnostic performance characteristics (field samples). Diagnostic performance characteristics of a newly developed H5-specific
multiplex RT-qPCR for detection and differentiation of clade 2.2.1p proper (black triangles) and 2.2.1v variant HPAIV H5N1 strains (open triangles)
from Egypt compared to standard H5 RT-qPCR [20]. The analysis comprises 50 M-PCR positive field samples obtained within the frame of the
Egyptian poultry surveillance program from commercial poultry farms (n = 11) and backyard holdings (n = 39). See Additional file 4, Table S4, for
individual values. Grey dots represent samples in which both clades were detected. X-axis: Ct-values obtained by the generic H5 RT-qPCR [20].
Y-axis: Ct-values generated by the specific component of the multiplex RT-qPCR as indicated above each graph.
Abdelwhab et al. Virology Journal 2010, 7:260
http://www.virologyj.com/content/7/1/260
non-H5 AIV or other avian pathogens was evident.
However, the assay can not be used for generic detection of subtype H5 viruses as a large percentage of nonEgyptian H5 subtype strains could not be detected.
In terms of diagnostic performance regarding the
HPAIV H5N1 strains currently circulating in Egypt, the
multiplex assay was at least equal to standard RT-qPCRs
targeting the M gene of AIV and superior to a generic
H5 RT-qPCR [23] when examining swabs which
originated from experimental infections or from field
samples of poultry holdings in Egypt. The generic H5specific RT-qPCR assay described by Slomka et al. [23]
apparently missed five Egyptian field samples, possibly
due to mismatches in binding regions of primers and/or
probes; one of the missed samples was assigned to lineage 2.2.1v while four of them belonged to 2.2.1p. In
three field samples the multiplex assay detected both
clades with almost similar Ct values (Additional file 4,
Table S4, #9, #17, #18). The field samples analysed were
derived from pooled swabs of five birds of each holding;
as such it can not be excluded that infections with both
clades occurred simultaneously at these holdings. Work
is in progress to clarify these cases by sequencing clones
of HA gene fragments. A similar situation was also
encountered with two isolates (Additional file 1, Table
S1, #3, #18); alignment of primer and probe sequences
with the published sequences of these isolates, however,
did not yield any hint for an unspecific reactivity. A
contamination of these isolates can only be excluded by
sequencing clones of HA gene fragments.
Reducing the amount of circulating HPAIV H5N1
virus by concerted actions of rapid and specific testing,
culling and vaccination of poultry is the key to mitigate
the risk of human infections and fatalities in Egypt.
Controlling the endemic HPAIV H5N1 situation in
Egypt is particularly painstaking because of [1] the concentration of the majority of commercial and backyard
poultry business in a very small part of the whole country (Nile valley and, particularly, Nile delta), [2] the
integration/contacts of backyard birds within small
commercial poultry farms (farms with 5.000-20.000
birds represent circa 75% of the poultry production), [3]
the marketing system (random uncontrolled movement
of birds to/from live bird markets), and [4] day
labourers at commercial farms usually raise backyard
birds in their houses. In addition, continuing viral evolution which is even further accelerated and skewed by
vaccination pressure remains a daily challenge for diagnostic measures which are at the root of all efforts to
control the situation. Characterization of currently circulating strains and, if required, adaptation of amplification-based diagnostic tools, such as introduced here, is
essential to improve the situation.
Page 6 of 8
Conclusions
The necessity to update commercial and generic
H5-specific RT-qPCRs for the Egyptian situation has
been stressed recently [24]. The current assay provides
this update. The assay is tailored to suite the special
Egyptian situation. Therefore, the multiplex assay is not
recommended for use elsewhere, particularly in areas
where non-clade 2.2 HPAIV H5N1 are prevalent. Also,
should new lineages of HPAIV H5N1 be introduced
into Egypt, such as the 2.3.2 subclade viruses which
already escaped from Central and South-eastern Asia to
South-eastern Europe earlier in 2010, the current assay
will need updating again. In addition to detection of
clade 2.2.1p H5 HPAIV the multiplex assay also allows
the positive identification of the 2.2.1v lineage of vaccine
escape mutants. This lineage probably evolved in commercial chicken farms where vaccination using standard
LPAIV H5 strains was practiced. Recent studies have
shown that new vaccines might be required to efficiently
induce protective immunity against lineage 2.2.1v viruses
in poultry [11]. The multiplex assay therefore may also
be instrumental in decision-making regarding the type
of vaccine to be used for the specific outbreak situation.
Methods
Reference viruses and bacteria
A panel of 50 HPAIV H5N1 strains isolated in SPFchicken eggs in the National Laboratory for Quality
Control on Poultry Production (NLQP) in Egypt was
used for determination of the analytical specificity and
sensitivity of the PCR assays (Additional file 1, Table S1).
In addition 42 further avian influenza viruses of subtypes H1 [4], H2 [5], H5 [22], H6 [5], H7 [3], and H9
[3] from the repository of German National Reference
Laboratory for Avian Influenza, Friedrich-Loeffler
Institute, were analysed (Additional file 2, Table S2).
Non-orthomyxoviruses and several bacterial species
were used to further determine the specificity of the
assay.
Primer/probe design
A collection of 316 near full length H5 gene segment
sequences of H5N1 viruses circulating in Egypt between
2006 and 2010 was retrieved from the public GenBank
data base. Sequences were aligned using MUSCLE [25]
and manually edited. Primers and probes design were
selected from a variable region of the HA2 gene for detection of an 85 bp fragment and a more conserved region in
the HA1 gene region for detection of a 106 bp fragment
(Table 1, Figure 1). Primers P1FW-Standard-EGY, P1RVEGY and probe PRO1a-Standard-EGY were used for
detection of the clade 2.2.1p strains (HEX channel).
Primers P1FW-Variant-EGY, P1RV-EGY and probe
Abdelwhab et al. Virology Journal 2010, 7:260
http://www.virologyj.com/content/7/1/260
PRO-Variant-EGY (FAM channel) were used for detection
of the clade 2.2.1v variant strains. Primers P2FW-Standard-EGY, P2FW-Variant-EGY, P2RV-Standard-EGY and
P2RV-Variant-EGY and probe PRO2-EGY were used for
detection of both lineages via the ROX channel.
Real time RT-PCR optimization
The concentration of primers and probes was optimized in separate PCRs (two primers, one probe) and
re-adjusted when combined in the multiplex RT-qPCR
to increase the efficiency of amplification. Likewise,
different annealing temperatures ranging from 50 to
60°C and different chemistries (SuperScript III OneStep RT-PCR system with Platinum Taq DNA polymerase [Invitrogen]; Quantitect One step kit; [Qiagen])
were evaluated. Reactions were carried out in a 25-μl
volume on an MX3005P real time PCR machine
(Stratagene).
Quantitative analysis
For preparation of standard controls, the cloned H5
gene segment from A/chicken/Egypt/0879-NLQP/2008
(clade 2.2.1v) and A/chicken/Egypt/NLQP-0918Q/2009
(clade 2.2.1p) was used for generating cRNA in vitro by
run-off transcriptions performed as previously described
[18]. Detection limit of the RT-qPCR was determined
using 10-fold serial dilutions (101-107 copies) of cRNA.
Samples from experimentally infected chickens
All animal experiments were conducted following official German animal welfare regulations (LALLF M-V/
TSD/7221.3-2.1-031/09). Six weeks old SPF chickens (n =
10, each) were infected by the oculo-nasal route with a
dose of 106.0 TCID50 of A/chicken/Egypt/0879-NLQP/
2008 (clade 2.2.1v) or A/chicken/Egypt/NLQP-0918Q/
2009 (clade 2.2.1p) (Grund et al., unpublished). RNA was
extracted from mixed oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs
collected from individual birds 2 or 7 days post infection
(dpi). RNA was used in quantitative RT-qPCRs described
in this study and compared to M and H5 based RT-qPCR
assays as previously described [14,23].
Field samples
Tracheal and cloacal swabs were collected both from
poultry at commercial farms (n = 11) and backyard
holdings (n = 39) in the frame of the national surveillance scheme in poultry sectors in Egypt from 2008 to
2010. Oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs from five birds
were pooled for RNA extraction and PCR analysis.
Nucleic acid extraction
Extraction of RNA from 140 μl of allantoic fluid (RNA
viral isolates) or swab fluid (field samples, experimental
Page 7 of 8
infections) was carried out using the QIAamp viral RNA
mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was eluted from the
columns with 50 μl of DEPC-treated water and used
immediately or after storage at -80°C. Likewise, DNA
was extracted from bacterial species and DNA viruses
(Additional file 2, Table S2) using the QIAamp DNA
mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
Statistics
In addition to the descriptive evaluation of the test
results, the technical sensitivity of the new multiplex
RT-qPCR was investigated by comparing positive Ctvalues with those of the standard H5-specific RT-qPCR
test recommended by Slomka et al. [23]. For this purpose, Fisher’s exact tests were applied considering the
one-sided hypothesis of achieving lower Ct-values by
the multiplex RT-qPCR than by the standard test. All
statistical calculations have been performed using R,
Version 2.8.1 (2008-12-22) [26].
Additional material
Additional file 1: Detection and differentiation of HPAIV H5N1
isolates collected from commercial poultry and backyard birds in
Egypt in 2006- 2010 by multiplex H5 RT-qPCR and a generic H5specific RT-qPCR [20].
Additional file 2: Analytical specificity of the multiplex RT-qPCR for
Egyptian HPAIV H5N1 using different avian influenza virus isolates
and other avian pathogens.
Additional file 3: Detection and differentiation of HPAIV H5N1 in
selected swab samples collected from SPF chickens experimentally
infected with Egyptian clade 2.2.1p proper or 2.2.1v variant HPAI
H5N1 virus strains by multiplex H5 RT-qPCR compared to a
standard generic H5 RT-qPCR protocol.
Additional file 4: Detection and differentiation of HPAIV H5N1 in
pooled swab samples collected from commercial poultry and
backyard birds in Egypt in 2008- 2010 by multiplex H5 RT-qPCR
compared to standard generic H5 and M gene RT-qPCR protocols.
List of abbreviations
AIV: avian influenza virus; DPI: days post infection; FLI: Friedrich-LoefflerInstitute; HPAI: highly pathogenic avian influenza; LPAIV: avian influenza virus
of low pathogenicity; HA: hemagglutinin; NLQP: National Laboratory for
Quality Control on Poultry Production; O.I.E.: World Organization for Animal
Health; RT-qPCR: real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
ESAW carried out part of the development studies, the analytical and the
diagnostic evaluation; he performed the sequence alignments and helped to
draft the manuscript. AME and ASA carried out parts of the analytical and
diagnostic evaluation using Egyptian samples. MZ carried out the statistical
tests. CG, MMA and HMH provided samples for analysis, participated in the
design of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. TCH conceived and
coordinated the study, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and
approved the final manuscript.
Abdelwhab et al. Virology Journal 2010, 7:260
http://www.virologyj.com/content/7/1/260
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to our co-workers and colleagues for excellent technical
work in the FLI, Germany, and the NLQP, Egypt. El-Sayed is funded by a
grant from the German Academic Exchange Service to the Free University of
Berlin. Work by the authors on Egyptian HPAIV H5N1 is co-funded in the
frame of an O.I.E. Twinning project between the Animal Health Research
Institute, Giza, and the FLI, Riems.
Author details
1
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. 2Animal Health
Research Institute, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. 3Institute of Poultry Diseases, Free
University, Berlin, Germany.
Received: 30 August 2010 Accepted: 7 October 2010
Published: 7 October 2010
References
1. WHO/OIE/FAO H5N1 Evolution Working Group: Continuing progress
towards a unified nomenclature for the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian
influenza viruses: divergence of clade 2.2 viruses. Influenza Other Respi
Viruses 2009, 3:59-62.
2. Meleigy M: Egypt battles with avian influenza. Lancet 2007, 370:553-554.
3. Fasina FO, Ifende VI, Ajibade AA: Avian influenza A(H5N1) in humans:
lessons from Egypt. Euro Surveill 2009, 15(4) [http://www.eurosurveillance.
org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId = 19473], pii = 19473.
4. Peiris JS, de Jong MD, Guan Y: Avian influenza virus (H5N1): a threat to
human health. Clinical Microbiol Rev 2007, 20:243-267.
5. Aly MM, Arafa A, Hassan MK: Epidemiological findings of outbreaks of
disease caused by highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus in
poultry in Egypt during 2006. Avian Dis 2008, 52:269-277.
6. Abdelwhab EM, Selim A, Arafa A, Galal S, Kilany WH, Hassan MK, Aly MM,
Hafez HM: Circulation of avian influenza H5N1 in live bird markets in
Egypt. Avian Dis 2010, 54:911-914.
7. Arafa A, Suarez DL, Hassan MK, Aly MM: Phylogenetic analysis of HA and
NA genes of HPAI-H5N1 Egyptian strains isolated from 2006 to 2008
indicates heterogeneity with multiple distinct sublineages. Avian Dis
2010, 54:345-349.
8. Balish AL, Davis T, Saad MD, El-Sayed N, Esmat H, Tjaden JA, Earhart KC,
Ahmed LE, Abd El-Halem M, Hakem M, Ali AM, Nassif SA, El-Ebiary EA,
Taha M, Aly MM, Arafa A, O’Neill E, Xiyan X, Cox NJ, Donis RO, Klimov AI:
Antigenic and genetic diversity of highly pathogenic avian influenza A
(H5N1) viruses isolated in Egypt. Avian Dis 2010, 54:329-334.
9. van den Berg T, Lambrecht B, Marché S, Steensels M, Van Borm S,
Bublot M: Influenza vaccines and vaccination strategies in birds. Comp
Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2008, 31:121-165.
10. WHO. 2010. World Health Organization: Situation updates–avian influenza.
[http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/updates/en/index.html],
[cited 2010, June 13;].
11. Kim J, Kayali G, Walker D, Forrest HL, Ellebedy AH, Griffin YS, Rubrum A,
Bahgat MM, Kutkatd MA, Ali MAA, Aldridge JR, Negovetich NJ, Krauss S,
Webby RJ, Webster RG: Puzzling inefficiency of H5N1 influenza vaccines
in Egyptian poultry. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010, 107:11044-9.
12. Terregino C, Toffan A, Cilloni F, Monne I, Bertoli E, Castellanos L, Amarin N,
Mancin M, Capua I: Evaluation of the protection induced by avian
influenza vaccines containing a 1994 Mexican H5N2 LPAI seed strain
against a 2008 Egyptian H5N1 HPAI virus belonging to clade 2.2.1 by
means of serological and in vivo tests. Avian Pathol 2010, 39:215-222.
13. Di Trani L, Bedini B, Donatelli I, Campitelli L, Chiappini B, De Marco MA,
Delogu M, Buonavoglia C, Vaccari GA: Sensitive one-step real-time PCR for
detection of avian influenza viruses using a MGB probe and an internal
positive control. BMC Infect Dis 2006, 6:87.
14. Spackman E, Senne DA, Myers TJ, Bulaga LL, Garber LP, Perdue ML,
Lohman K, Daum LT, Suarez DL: Development of a real-time reverse
transcriptase PCR assay for type A influenza virus and the avian H5 and
H7 haemagglutinin subtypes. J Clin Microbiol 2002, 40:3256-3260.
15. Muradrasoli S, Mohamed N, Belák S, Czifra G, Herrmann B, Berencsi G,
Blomberg J: Broadly targeted triplex real-time PCR detection of influenza
A, B and C viruses based on the nucleoprotein gene and a novel
“MegaBeacon” probe strategy. J Virol Methods 2010, 163:313-322.
16. Suarez DL, Das A, Ellis E: Review of rapid molecular diagnostic tools for
avian influenza virus. Avian Dis 2007, 51:201-208.
Page 8 of 8
17. Chen W, He B, Li C, Zhang X, Wu W, Yin X, Fan B, Fan X, Wang J: Real-time
RT-PCR for H5N1 avian influenza A virus detection. J Med Microbiol 2007,
5:603-607.
18. Hoffman E, Stech J, Guan Y, Webster RG, Perez D: Universal primer set for
the full-length amplification of all influenza A viruses. Arch Virol 2001,
146:2275-2289.
19. Li PQ, Zhang J, Muller CP, Chen JX, Yang ZF, Zhang R, Li J, He YS:
Development of a multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction for the
detection of influenza virus type A including H5 and H9 subtypes. Diagn
Microbiol Infect Dis 2008, 61:192-197.
20. Lu YY, Yan JY, Feng Y, Xu CP, Shi W, Mao HY: Rapid detection of H5 avian
influenza virus by TaqMan-MGB real-time RT-PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol
2008, 46:20-25.
21. Ng LF, Barr I, Nguyen I, Noor SM, Tan RS, Agathe LV, Gupta S, Khalil H,
To TL, Hassan SS, Ren EC: Specific detection of H5N1 avian influenza A
virus in field specimens by a one-step RT-PCR assay. BMC Infect Dis 2006,
6:40.
22. Payungporn S, Chutinimitkul S, Chaisingh A, Damrongwantanapokin D,
Buranathai C, Amonsin A, Theamboonlers A, Poovorawan YJ: Single step
multiplex real-time RT-PCR for H5N1 influenza A virus detection. J Virol
Methods 2006, 131:143-147.
23. Slomka MJ, Pavlidis T, Banks J, Shell W, McNally A, Essen S, Brown IH:
Validated H5 Eurasian real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain
reaction and its application in H5N1 outbreaks in 2005-2006. Avian Dis
2007, 51:373-377.
24. Arafa A, Selim AA, Hassan MK, Aly MM: Genetic characterization of variant
strains of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 that escaped
detection by real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR diagnostic tests. Avian
Dis 2010, 54:673-676.
25. Edgar RC: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and
high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:1792-1797.
26. R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical
computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria 2008
[http://www.R-project.org], ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
doi:10.1186/1743-422X-7-260
Cite this article as: Abdelwhab et al.: Simultaneous detection and
differentiation by multiplex real time RT-PCR of highly pathogenic avian
influenza subtype H5N1 classic (clade 2.2.1 proper) and escape mutant
(clade 2.2.1 variant) lineages in Egypt. Virology Journal 2010 7:260.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
and take full advantage of:
• Convenient online submission
• Thorough peer review
• No space constraints or color figure charges
• Immediate publication on acceptance
• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
• Research which is freely available for redistribution
Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit
</pre>
</body>
</html>