-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: add robots.txt & sitemap.xml generation for packit #23
Comments
Hello Maintainers , want some clarification on this feature , i know "the primary use of "Packit" is to optimize and bundle code for faster and more efficient ", can you kindly explain this feature and how Packit is related to this feature ? |
Primary use of "Packit" is to generate code based on different conditions met. This idea gives interested devs access to low level API access (useful for monkey patching). The default readers & writers (read the docs first btw) generates code (and transpiles the necessary code too) to make it work. please read I would suggest adding robots.txt and sitemap.xml to the DISCLAIMER: Packit ISN'T FAST than others. It feels and is fast only because of the underlying transpilers, readers & writers attached w/ it. Reejs uses sucrase transpiler instead of transpilers like swc, which seem to be resonable and faster for our given field of usage. YOU CAN make Packit SLOW if you make use of such transpilers that are slower than the ones we use. Packit is just a cool handler that knows how to do the things as they're meant to be done. if-else conditions, file caching, URL Imports and cherry-picked underlying dependencies makes Packit fast. The writers are friendly towards you, they can share, modify (and DELETE!) variables for your context. This feature is the reason why writers are ran serially instead of parallely. The |
Oh.. Thanks for the clean explanation! Going to learn something new ! Can you assign this feat to me ? |
Done |
@Tholkappiar any updates? |
Unassign this issue from me , I will work on this issue later ! |
Can i Take this? |
@sumanthmadishetty feel free to work on this. There's not much contributors so dw about someone else taking up the job |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: