Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Column names to allow for nested Objects fieldtype #161

Closed
harinij opened this issue Aug 20, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Column names to allow for nested Objects fieldtype #161

harinij opened this issue Aug 20, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@harinij
Copy link
Member

harinij commented Aug 20, 2020

Currently Firetable allows for only camelcase field naming, expand it to allow for nested objects retrieval

@harinij harinij added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 20, 2020
@Antler-VC
Copy link

implemented in #165

@n-sviridenko
Copy link
Contributor

Single select writes the data in both the old and the new ways. For example, if the field name is project.name, in the db it'll look like:

{
  'project.name': 'Test', // <-- this is redundant
  project: {
    name: 'Test'
  }
}

@murat0
Copy link

murat0 commented Aug 12, 2021

Single select writes the data in both the old and the new ways. For example, if the field name is project.name, in the db it'll look like:

{
  'project.name': 'Test', // <-- this is redundant
  project: {
    name: 'Test'
  }
}

Not just single select - when I try and add a nested field with a type using "parent.child" notation I get duplicate entries in firestore.

@notsidney
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, this is fixed as of v2.0.0

You can migrate the latest version of Rowy by using this easy deploy link on your Firestore project: rowy.app/deploy. Try it out and we would love to get your feedback on Discord 🙏

@notsidney notsidney reopened this Sep 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants