Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ATSAMD processor family support #995

Closed
kyp44 opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1014
Closed

ATSAMD processor family support #995

kyp44 opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1014

Comments

@kyp44
Copy link
Contributor

kyp44 commented Nov 12, 2024

I have implemented and tested RTC-based monotonics (for RTIC v2) for ATSAMD processors, but it is unclear to me where these should reside.

Others are also working on timer-based monotonics.

As the maintainers here have a stake in this, I thought you might be interested in adding to the discussion over at atsamd-rs about this.

I would request that any ongoing discussion happen over there just so it's all in once place. Once we collectively decide where to put this, I can issue a PR to the appropriate project.

@kyp44
Copy link
Contributor Author

kyp44 commented Dec 17, 2024

RFC

The RTC-based monotonics are complete and well-tested (at least on SAMx51x platforms), but there are some issues related to possible publication in rtic-monotonics that I am hoping rtic-monotonics maintainers can weight in on:

  1. There is a question regarding RTC clock setup. See the description and discussion starting here.
  2. There is another question about whether to remove monotonics that are not the best choices for end users. See the description and discussion starting here.

@kyp44
Copy link
Contributor Author

kyp44 commented Jan 24, 2025

Just submitted PR #1014 to add references in the rtic-monotonics documentation.

@AfoHT AfoHT linked a pull request Jan 25, 2025 that will close this issue
@AfoHT AfoHT closed this as completed Jan 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants