You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Because multiple BNodes which are distinct but share the same identifier may be introduced into a Mutable, there should be a mechanism (similar to that for Writers in #262) to modify the identifier of nodes that are shared to avoid confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Probably best to do in Enumerable and yield a new enumerable which has de-dupped nodes. However, the footprint of this is pretty large, and it is probably not useful, given de-dupping in Writer#write_statement.
Because multiple BNodes which are distinct but share the same identifier may be introduced into a Mutable, there should be a mechanism (similar to that for Writers in #262) to modify the identifier of nodes that are shared to avoid confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: