We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Debian CI revealed that the test combinations_inexact_size_hints fails on 32-bit architectures with an integer overflow
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/rust-itertools/testing/i386/52667389/#S9
605s ---- combinations_inexact_size_hints stdout ---- 605s thread 'combinations_inexact_size_hints' panicked at /usr/src/rustc-1.80.1/library/core/src/iter/traits/accum.rs:149:1: 605s attempt to multiply with overflow
I patched this in Debian by converting the values to u64 before doing the calculation and converting them back at the end.
https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/blob/1e0bed11cc4ef40067840f9a9525eb94a0f146d9/src/itertools/debian/patches/fix-integer-overflow-in-test.patch
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Debian CI revealed that the test combinations_inexact_size_hints fails on 32-bit architectures with an integer overflow
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/rust-itertools/testing/i386/52667389/#S9
605s ---- combinations_inexact_size_hints stdout ----
605s thread 'combinations_inexact_size_hints' panicked at /usr/src/rustc-1.80.1/library/core/src/iter/traits/accum.rs:149:1:
605s attempt to multiply with overflow
I patched this in Debian by converting the values to u64 before doing the calculation and converting them back at the end.
https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/blob/1e0bed11cc4ef40067840f9a9525eb94a0f146d9/src/itertools/debian/patches/fix-integer-overflow-in-test.patch
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: