-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release: 0.4.1 #211
Release: 0.4.1 #211
Conversation
## [0.4.1] - 2017-12-17 | ||
### Added | ||
- `no_std` support | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few other changes:
- Added HC-128 RNG. Maybe with the description that it is similar to ISAAC, but proven to be cryptographically secure and often faster.
- Technically
Isaac64Rng::next_u32
is a breaking change, because it no longer throws away half the results. {IsaacRng, Isaac64Rng}::new_unseeded
is no longer available. Use{IsaacRng, Isaac64Rng}::new_from_u64(0)
as replacement.- RNG's no longer implement
Copy
. - RNG's have a custom Debug implementation that does not expose the internal state.
Does it make sense to say something about impls
? Or not advertise it too widely, because it may move to rand_core
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think any of that's merged yet.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought it was your goal to include them in this release after #205 (comment). Because they contain (small) breaking changes, they can't be part of 0.4.* if we follow semver.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the comments. Didn't think about lack of Copy
being a breaking change, but you're right, it is (maybe we should add a deprecated impl?). new_unseeded
we can potentially add back as a deprecated
wrapper fn. So perhaps those changes can't land in 0.4 after all, or at least not all of them :/
BTW it should have been clear from this PR what was/wasn't in the release.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I finally get the scheme you have in mind 😄
Merged (via rebase). Probably 0.4.2 won't be too far away so won't feature creep. |
No description provided.