-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uplift temporary-cstring-as-ptr
lint from clippy
into rustc
#346
Labels
major-change
A proposal to make a major change to rustc
major-change-accepted
A major change proposal that was accepted
T-compiler
Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team
Comments
nathanwhit
added
T-compiler
Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team
major-change
A proposal to make a major change to rustc
labels
Aug 18, 2020
This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed. |
@rustbot second |
rustbot
added
the
final-comment-period
The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement
label
Sep 21, 2020
spastorino
added
major-change-accepted
A major change proposal that was accepted
and removed
final-comment-period
The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement
labels
Oct 1, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
major-change
A proposal to make a major change to rustc
major-change-accepted
A major change proposal that was accepted
T-compiler
Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team
Proposal
Move the
temporary-cstring-as-ptr
lint fromclippy
into the compiler. The lint would be deny by default, and fire when attempting to take the pointer of a temporaryCString
.For instance, the following code
would trigger the lint. This mistake is common and potentially dangerous, to the extent the documentation specifically warns about it, so it would be ideal for the compiler to help prevent this particular footgun.
Mentors or Reviewers
I've performed this change in rust-lang/rust#75671. cc @oli-obk
Process
The main points of the Major Change Process is as follows:
@rustbot second
.-C flag
, then full team check-off is required.@rfcbot fcp merge
on either the MCP or the PR.You can read more about Major Change Proposals on forge.
Comments
This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: