-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 627
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Broken intra-rustdoc-links #1903
Comments
This seems to be somewhat related to rust-lang/rust#60883, the link from Applying the suggested change to use an absolute path ( |
I don't understand why there's no warning emitted currently though. I was scared of rust-lang/rust#58917 causing warnings for cases like this to be suppressed, but that never got merged, so it should be emitting a warning when building the |
I didn't pay attention that link from This's especially strange because after change to |
I think this should be fixed now that rust-lang/rust#65983 has been fixed :) |
Confirmed this has been fixed 🎉 |
I created an issue rust-lang/rust#64193 month ago and there's no progress at all up to 8 october. The problem is that intra-rustdoc-links don't work correctly.
Now these links (for ex.)
try_send
,channel
don't redirect to correct destination, moreover in some places without context reader can't understand method of which
trait
/impl
/mod
is mentioned.If change them to the full path, we will get warnings (see issue), however links will work. Maybe it's ok for now to have warnings but correctly working links? I could prepare PR with expanded links.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: