-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Value of f32.is_sign_positive() differs from native code #3139
Comments
This is most likely caused by rust-lang/rust#116551. Miri is now implementing the NaN semantics proposed in rust-lang/rfcs#3514, which aligns Miri with codegen. Rust does not guarantee anything about the sign of NaNs, and that can already be observed in real code, so Miri always returning the same sign was a bug that we fixed. |
Although we make no promises about the sign of NaNs produced by arithmetic expressions, deserializing a +NaN should produce a +NaN, and the sign should be preserved under copies. |
Thanks for the links! I had not seen the RFC or PR. @Muon I think there ends up being a I will need to update serde to go through something like this: fn f64_as_f32(f: f64) -> f32 {
if /* ??? */ && f.is_nan() {
if f.is_sign_positive() {
f32::NAN
} else {
-f32::NAN
}
} else {
f as f32
}
} where |
@dtolnay IEEE 754 doesn't guarantee that format conversions preserve NaN sign, and neither does LLVM. Also, |
Good call. Something like this then: fn f64_as_f32(f: f64) -> f32 {
(f as f32).copysign(if f.is_sign_positive() { 1.0 } else { -1.0 })
} |
Yes that kind of cast would reliably preserve the sign. Other parts of the NaN (signaling, payload) are still non-deterministic though (subject to the guarantees in the RFC). |
3 new clippy lints to come out of this:
Thanks @epage. And thanks @RalfJung for implementing rust-lang/rust#116551, the educational value has been large. |
In the most recently nightly, I started getting a failing test with
cargo miri test
in https://github.com/dtolnay/basic-toml. The crate does not contain unsafe code so I wonder whether this could be a Miri bug.The failing test is here, specifically this assertion. It deserializes a f32 from TOML
+nan
and asserts that.is_sign_positive()
returns true. Undercargo test
, the f32's bit pattern is 0x7FC0_0000 which is +NaN. Undercargo miri test
the bit pattern is 0xFFC0_0000 which is -NaN and the test fails.https://github.com/dtolnay/basic-toml/actions/runs/6634770330/job/18024693503
I made some attempts at a minimal repro along the lines of the following, but was not able to reproduce a -NaN this way, yet.
Next I tried bisecting Miri commits by doing
./miri toolchain && ./miri install
in the miri repo followed bycargo +miri miri test --test float
against that commit of the basic-toml repo linked above. The bisect landed on #3136 which has no relevant code change in miri. Based on the rust-version change in that PR, I checkedgit diff 9e3f784eb2c..62fae2305e5
(rust-lang/rust@9e3f784...62fae23#files_bucket) which also had nothing that looked relevant.I'll keep working on a minimal repro but filing this now in case you have a ready way to debug this kind of thing, or spot something obvious in #3136 or the rustc diff that I overlooked.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: