Skip to content

Document type grammar #299

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
alercah opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Document type grammar #299

alercah opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
New Content Missing features or aspects of language not currently documented.

Comments

@alercah
Copy link
Contributor

alercah commented Apr 3, 2018

Currently the reference does not document the grammar for types. This is relevant for precedence of operators, e.g. how &(Foo + Sized) must be written rather than &Foo + Sized.

A type grammar is present in RFC 0438, but I don't know if it's up to date.
@alercah alercah added the New Content Missing features or aspects of language not currently documented. label Apr 3, 2018
@alercah alercah mentioned this issue Apr 3, 2018
Closed
@matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor

cc #84

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Oct 6, 2018

I think this can be closed now that #433 is done. Hopefully it describes the + operator ambiguity sufficiently.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
New Content Missing features or aspects of language not currently documented.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ehuss @matthewjasper @alercah