- Start Date: 2014-03-31
- RFC PR: rust-lang/rfcs#26
- Rust Issue: rust-lang/rust#13535
This RFC is a proposal to remove the usage of the keyword priv
from the Rust
language.
By removing priv
entirely from the language, it significantly simplifies the
privacy semantics as well as the ability to explain it to newcomers. The one
remaining case, private enum variants, can be rewritten as such:
// pub enum Foo {
// Bar,
// priv Baz,
// }
pub enum Foo {
Bar,
Baz(BazInner)
}
pub struct BazInner(());
// pub enum Foo2 {
// priv Bar2,
// priv Baz2,
// }
pub struct Foo2 {
variant: FooVariant
}
enum FooVariant {
Bar2,
Baz2,
}
Private enum variants are a rarely used feature of the language, and are
generally not regarded as a strong enough feature to justify the priv
keyword
entirely.
There remains only one use case of the priv
visibility qualifier in the Rust
language, which is to make enum variants private. For example, it is possible
today to write a type such as:
pub enum Foo {
Bar,
priv Baz
}
In this example, the variant Bar
is public, while the variant Baz
is
private. This RFC would remove this ability to have private enum variants.
In addition to disallowing the priv
keyword on enum variants, this RFC would
also forbid visibility qualifiers in front of enum variants entirely, as they no
longer serve any purpose.
This RFC would demote the identifier priv
from being a keyword to being a
reserved keyword (in case we find a use for it in the future).
- Allow private enum variants, as-is today.
- Add a new keyword for
enum
which means "my variants are all private" with controls to make variants public.
- Is the assertion that private enum variants are rarely used true? Are there
legitimate use cases for keeping the
priv
keyword?