You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#558 was merged as a conservative step that restricts a small edge case to gain some correctness assistance, possible features and vastly improved error messages for invalid generic specification via f<a>(b).
We're not sure if the grammar special case is worth this, so we should revisit and possibly relax/revert the rule.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd rather have chaining operations, like, in #2083, to be quite honest. This alternative is so rarely actually useful (as to be completely useless, imo)
Centril
added
the
T-lang
Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the RFC.
label
Feb 23, 2018
#558 was merged as a conservative step that restricts a small edge case to gain some correctness assistance, possible features and vastly improved error messages for invalid generic specification via
f<a>(b)
.We're not sure if the grammar special case is worth this, so we should revisit and possibly relax/revert the rule.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: