Skip to content

`GLIBC_2.18' not found -- required by rust-analyzer-linux #4426

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
rdfriese opened this issue May 11, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

`GLIBC_2.18' not found -- required by rust-analyzer-linux #4426

rdfriese opened this issue May 11, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@rdfriese
Copy link

I'm using VSCode Remote-ssh, the plugin and server install fine, unfortunately my system has an older version of glibc (updating this system is not easily possible). Compiling myself isn't a big deal, but would it be possible for the released binaries to be compiled on a system with an older version of glibc? I'm lazy and being able to use the auto update feature is quite nice!

@bjorn3
Copy link
Member

bjorn3 commented May 11, 2020

#4157 (comment)

no, no specific plans -- the current assumption is that for most users the binaries we publish are fine. SO, I don't think it makes sense to make our current CI more complicated to get the long tail. Once we ship via rustup, that should be fixed.

@matklad
Copy link
Member

matklad commented May 11, 2020

#4427 might, or might not fix it. I think I'll close this issue as:

  • I don't think it makes sense for us to make CI more complicated to handle the long tail
  • the point would become moot once we ship via rustup

@matklad matklad closed this as completed May 11, 2020
@rdfriese
Copy link
Author

Understandable, figured I would ask, thanks for the quick response and great work!

@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented May 11, 2020

If you're on CentOS, that PR won't help, unfortunately.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants