Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No link to "send bound" problem #19

Closed
carols10cents opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

No link to "send bound" problem #19

carols10cents opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@carols10cents
Copy link
Member

There's two spots in async_fn_everywhere that try to link to [sb], but there isn't a corresponding [sb]: https://.... definition. I would fix this myself, but I don't know where this should link to 😅

The spots:

  • **Send bounds.** A number of key pieces in the async Rust ecosystem remain unstable or stalled in their development by the lack of language features and/or standard interop traits. For example, the widely used [tower](https://crates.io/crates/tower) crate hasn't yet released a 1.0 of its `Service` trait because they are blocked waiting on a solution to the ["send bound"][sb] problem.
  • The goal for the year is to stabilize a solution to the ["send bound" problem][sb].
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Jun 12, 2024

I think these links are about rust-lang/rfcs#3654

@traviscross
Copy link
Contributor

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Jun 13, 2024

That is indeed what the now open async project goal RFC links to, here.

Apparently this page has been rewritten for the RFC and this link has been fixed.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

fixed I think

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

Wait, no, I fixed it in the RFC :)

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis reopened this Jun 13, 2024
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

I should probably just redirect that page to the RFC

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants