Auto merge of #61812 - jonas-schievink:assoc-ty-defaults, r=nikomatsakis

Implement RFC 2532 – Associated Type Defaults

This is a partial implementation that is still missing the changes to object types, since I ran into some trouble while implementing that. I'm opening this part already to get feedback on the implementation and the unexpected test fallout (see my comments below). The remaining changes can be done in a later PR.

Blockers before this can land:
* [x] Resolve unsoundness around interaction with specialization (#61812 (comment)) - #64564

cc #29661
Fixes #53907
Fixes #54182
Fixes #62211
Fixes #41868
Fixes #63593
Fixes #47385
Fixes #43924
Fixes #32350
Fixes #26681
Fixes #67187

Author: bors

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0399.md

@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
+#### Note: this error code is no longer emitted by the compiler
+
 You implemented a trait, overriding one or more of its associated types but did
 not reimplement its default methods.
 
 Example of erroneous code:
 
-```compile_fail,E0399
+```
 #![feature(associated_type_defaults)]
 
 pub trait Foo {

src/librustc_infer/traits/project.rs

@@ -1054,25 +1054,40 @@ fn assemble_candidates_from_impls<'cx, 'tcx>(
                     // an error when we confirm the candidate
                     // (which will ultimately lead to `normalize_to_error`
                     // being invoked).
-                    node_item.item.defaultness.has_value()
+                    false
                 } else {
+                    // If we're looking at a trait *impl*, the item is
+                    // specializable if the impl or the item are marked
+                    // `default`.
                     node_item.item.defaultness.is_default()
                         || super::util::impl_is_default(selcx.tcx(), node_item.node.def_id())
                 };
 
-                // Only reveal a specializable default if we're past type-checking
-                // and the obligations is monomorphic, otherwise passes such as
-                // transmute checking and polymorphic MIR optimizations could
-                // get a result which isn't correct for all monomorphizations.
-                if !is_default {
-                    true
-                } else if obligation.param_env.reveal == Reveal::All {
-                    // NOTE(eddyb) inference variables can resolve to parameters, so
-                    // assume `poly_trait_ref` isn't monomorphic, if it contains any.
-                    let poly_trait_ref = selcx.infcx().resolve_vars_if_possible(&poly_trait_ref);
-                    !poly_trait_ref.needs_infer() && !poly_trait_ref.needs_subst()
-                } else {
-                    false
+                match is_default {
+                    // Non-specializable items are always projectable
+                    false => true,
+
+                    // Only reveal a specializable default if we're past type-checking
+                    // and the obligation is monomorphic, otherwise passes such as
+                    // transmute checking and polymorphic MIR optimizations could
+                    // get a result which isn't correct for all monomorphizations.
+                    true if obligation.param_env.reveal == Reveal::All => {
+                        // NOTE(eddyb) inference variables can resolve to parameters, so
+                        // assume `poly_trait_ref` isn't monomorphic, if it contains any.
+                        let poly_trait_ref =
+                            selcx.infcx().resolve_vars_if_possible(&poly_trait_ref);
+                        !poly_trait_ref.needs_infer() && !poly_trait_ref.needs_subst()
+                    }
+
+                    true => {
+                        debug!(
+                            "assemble_candidates_from_impls: not eligible due to default: \
+                             assoc_ty={} predicate={}",
+                            selcx.tcx().def_path_str(node_item.item.def_id),
+                            obligation.predicate,
+                        );
+                        false
+                    }
                 }
             }
             super::VtableParam(..) => {

src/librustc_typeck/check/mod.rs

@@ -1964,7 +1964,6 @@ fn check_impl_items_against_trait<'tcx>(
 
     // Locate trait definition and items
     let trait_def = tcx.trait_def(impl_trait_ref.def_id);
-    let mut overridden_associated_type = None;
 
     let impl_items = || impl_item_refs.iter().map(|iiref| tcx.hir().impl_item(iiref.id));
 
@@ -2046,9 +2045,6 @@ fn check_impl_items_against_trait<'tcx>(
                 hir::ImplItemKind::OpaqueTy(..) | hir::ImplItemKind::TyAlias(_) => {
                     let opt_trait_span = tcx.hir().span_if_local(ty_trait_item.def_id);
                     if ty_trait_item.kind == ty::AssocKind::Type {
-                        if ty_trait_item.defaultness.has_value() {
-                            overridden_associated_type = Some(impl_item);
-                        }
                         compare_ty_impl(
                             tcx,
                             &ty_impl_item,
@@ -2082,8 +2078,6 @@ fn check_impl_items_against_trait<'tcx>(
 
     // Check for missing items from trait
     let mut missing_items = Vec::new();
-    let mut invalidated_items = Vec::new();
-    let associated_type_overridden = overridden_associated_type.is_some();
     for trait_item in tcx.associated_items(impl_trait_ref.def_id).in_definition_order() {
         let is_implemented = trait_def
             .ancestors(tcx, impl_id)
@@ -2094,28 +2088,13 @@ fn check_impl_items_against_trait<'tcx>(
         if !is_implemented && !traits::impl_is_default(tcx, impl_id) {
             if !trait_item.defaultness.has_value() {
                 missing_items.push(*trait_item);
-            } else if associated_type_overridden {
-                invalidated_items.push(trait_item.ident);
             }
         }
     }
 
     if !missing_items.is_empty() {
         missing_items_err(tcx, impl_span, &missing_items, full_impl_span);
     }
-
-    if !invalidated_items.is_empty() {
-        let invalidator = overridden_associated_type.unwrap();
-        struct_span_err!(
-            tcx.sess,
-            invalidator.span,
-            E0399,
-            "the following trait items need to be reimplemented as `{}` was overridden: `{}`",
-            invalidator.ident,
-            invalidated_items.iter().map(|name| name.to_string()).collect::<Vec<_>>().join("`, `")
-        )
-        .emit();
-    }
 }
 
 fn missing_items_err(

src/librustc_typeck/check/wfcheck.rs

@@ -425,10 +425,109 @@ fn check_trait(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, item: &hir::Item<'_>) {
 
     for_item(tcx, item).with_fcx(|fcx, _| {
         check_where_clauses(tcx, fcx, item.span, trait_def_id, None);
+        check_associated_type_defaults(fcx, trait_def_id);
+
         vec![]
     });
 }
 
+/// Checks all associated type defaults of trait `trait_def_id`.
+///
+/// Assuming the defaults are used, check that all predicates (bounds on the
+/// assoc type and where clauses on the trait) hold.
+fn check_associated_type_defaults(fcx: &FnCtxt<'_, '_>, trait_def_id: DefId) {
+    let tcx = fcx.tcx;
+    let substs = InternalSubsts::identity_for_item(tcx, trait_def_id);
+
+    // For all assoc. types with defaults, build a map from
+    // `<Self as Trait<...>>::Assoc` to the default type.
+    let map = tcx
+        .associated_items(trait_def_id)
+        .in_definition_order()
+        .filter_map(|item| {
+            if item.kind == ty::AssocKind::Type && item.defaultness.has_value() {
+                // `<Self as Trait<...>>::Assoc`
+                let proj = ty::ProjectionTy { substs, item_def_id: item.def_id };
+                let default_ty = tcx.type_of(item.def_id);
+                debug!("assoc. type default mapping: {} -> {}", proj, default_ty);
+                Some((proj, default_ty))
+            } else {
+                None
+            }
+        })
+        .collect::<FxHashMap<_, _>>();
+
+    /// Replaces projections of associated types with their default types.
+    ///
+    /// This does a "shallow substitution", meaning that defaults that refer to
+    /// other defaulted assoc. types will still refer to the projection
+    /// afterwards, not to the other default. For example:
+    ///
+    /// ```compile_fail
+    /// trait Tr {
+    ///     type A: Clone = Vec<Self::B>;
+    ///     type B = u8;
+    /// }
+    /// ```
+    ///
+    /// This will end up replacing the bound `Self::A: Clone` with
+    /// `Vec<Self::B>: Clone`, not with `Vec<u8>: Clone`. If we did a deep
+    /// substitution and ended up with the latter, the trait would be accepted.
+    /// If an `impl` then replaced `B` with something that isn't `Clone`,
+    /// suddenly the default for `A` is no longer valid. The shallow
+    /// substitution forces the trait to add a `B: Clone` bound to be accepted,
+    /// which means that an `impl` can replace any default without breaking
+    /// others.
+    ///
+    /// Note that this isn't needed for soundness: The defaults would still be
+    /// checked in any impl that doesn't override them.
+    struct DefaultNormalizer<'tcx> {
+        tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
+        map: FxHashMap<ty::ProjectionTy<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>>,
+    }
+
+    impl<'tcx> ty::fold::TypeFolder<'tcx> for DefaultNormalizer<'tcx> {
+        fn tcx<'a>(&'a self) -> TyCtxt<'tcx> {
+            self.tcx
+        }
+
+        fn fold_ty(&mut self, t: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
+            match t.kind {
+                ty::Projection(proj_ty) => {
+                    if let Some(default) = self.map.get(&proj_ty) {
+                        default
+                    } else {
+                        t.super_fold_with(self)
+                    }
+                }
+                _ => t.super_fold_with(self),
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    // Now take all predicates defined on the trait, replace any mention of
+    // the assoc. types with their default, and prove them.
+    // We only consider predicates that directly mention the assoc. type.
+    let mut norm = DefaultNormalizer { tcx, map };
+    let predicates = fcx.tcx.predicates_of(trait_def_id);
+    for &(orig_pred, span) in predicates.predicates.iter() {
+        let pred = orig_pred.fold_with(&mut norm);
+        if pred != orig_pred {
+            // Mentions one of the defaulted assoc. types
+            debug!("default suitability check: proving predicate: {} -> {}", orig_pred, pred);
+            let pred = fcx.normalize_associated_types_in(span, &pred);
+            let cause = traits::ObligationCause::new(
+                span,
+                fcx.body_id,
+                traits::ItemObligation(trait_def_id),
+            );
+            let obligation = traits::Obligation::new(cause, fcx.param_env, pred);
+
+            fcx.register_predicate(obligation);
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 fn check_item_fn(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, item: &hir::Item<'_>) {
     for_item(tcx, item).with_fcx(|fcx, tcx| {
         let def_id = fcx.tcx.hir().local_def_id(item.hir_id);

src/test/ui/associated-const/defaults-cyclic-fail.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// build-fail
+
+// Cyclic assoc. const defaults don't error unless *used*
+trait Tr {
+    const A: u8 = Self::B;
+    //~^ ERROR cycle detected when const-evaluating + checking `Tr::A`
+
+    const B: u8 = Self::A;
+}
+
+// This impl is *allowed* unless its assoc. consts are used
+impl Tr for () {}
+
+fn main() {
+    // This triggers the cycle error
+    assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::A, 0);
+}

src/test/ui/associated-const/defaults-cyclic-fail.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+error[E0391]: cycle detected when const-evaluating + checking `Tr::A`
+  --> $DIR/defaults-cyclic-fail.rs:5:5
+   |
+LL |     const A: u8 = Self::B;
+   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+note: ...which requires const-evaluating `Tr::A`...
+  --> $DIR/defaults-cyclic-fail.rs:5:19
+   |
+LL |     const A: u8 = Self::B;
+   |                   ^^^^^^^
+note: ...which requires const-evaluating + checking `Tr::B`...
+  --> $DIR/defaults-cyclic-fail.rs:8:5
+   |
+LL |     const B: u8 = Self::A;
+   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+note: ...which requires const-evaluating `Tr::B`...
+  --> $DIR/defaults-cyclic-fail.rs:8:19
+   |
+LL |     const B: u8 = Self::A;
+   |                   ^^^^^^^
+   = note: ...which again requires const-evaluating + checking `Tr::A`, completing the cycle
+note: cycle used when const-evaluating `main`
+  --> $DIR/defaults-cyclic-fail.rs:16:16
+   |
+LL |     assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::A, 0);
+   |                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0391`.

src/test/ui/associated-const/defaults-cyclic-pass.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// run-pass
+
+// Cyclic assoc. const defaults don't error unless *used*
+trait Tr {
+    const A: u8 = Self::B;
+    const B: u8 = Self::A;
+}
+
+// This impl is *allowed* unless its assoc. consts are used, matching the
+// behavior without defaults.
+impl Tr for () {}
+
+// Overriding either constant breaks the cycle
+impl Tr for u8 {
+    const A: u8 = 42;
+}
+
+impl Tr for u16 {
+    const B: u8 = 0;
+}
+
+impl Tr for u32 {
+    const A: u8 = 100;
+    const B: u8 = 123;
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    assert_eq!(<u8 as Tr>::A, 42);
+    assert_eq!(<u8 as Tr>::B, 42);
+
+    assert_eq!(<u16 as Tr>::A, 0);
+    assert_eq!(<u16 as Tr>::B, 0);
+
+    assert_eq!(<u32 as Tr>::A, 100);
+    assert_eq!(<u32 as Tr>::B, 123);
+}

src/test/ui/associated-const/defaults-not-assumed-fail.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// build-fail
+
+trait Tr {
+    const A: u8 = 255;
+
+    // This should not be a constant evaluation error (overflow). The value of
+    // `Self::A` must not be assumed to hold inside the trait.
+    const B: u8 = Self::A + 1;
+    //~^ ERROR any use of this value will cause an error
+}
+
+// An impl that doesn't override any constant will NOT cause a const eval error
+// just because it's defined, but only if the bad constant is used anywhere.
+// This matches the behavior without defaults.
+impl Tr for () {}
+
+// An impl that overrides either constant with a suitable value will be fine.
+impl Tr for u8 {
+    const A: u8 = 254;
+}
+
+impl Tr for u16 {
+    const B: u8 = 0;
+}
+
+impl Tr for u32 {
+    const A: u8 = 254;
+    const B: u8 = 0;
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::A, 255);
+    assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::B, 0);    // causes the error above
+    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant expression failed
+    //~| ERROR erroneous constant used
+
+    assert_eq!(<u8 as Tr>::A, 254);
+    assert_eq!(<u8 as Tr>::B, 255);
+
+    assert_eq!(<u16 as Tr>::A, 255);
+    assert_eq!(<u16 as Tr>::B, 0);
+
+    assert_eq!(<u32 as Tr>::A, 254);
+    assert_eq!(<u32 as Tr>::B, 0);
+}

src/test/ui/associated-const/defaults-not-assumed-fail.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+error: any use of this value will cause an error
+  --> $DIR/defaults-not-assumed-fail.rs:8:19
+   |
+LL |     const B: u8 = Self::A + 1;
+   |     --------------^^^^^^^^^^^-
+   |                   |
+   |                   attempt to add with overflow
+   |
+   = note: `#[deny(const_err)]` on by default
+
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
+  --> $DIR/defaults-not-assumed-fail.rs:33:5
+   |
+LL |     assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::B, 0);    // causes the error above
+   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^-------------^^^^^
+   |                |
+   |                referenced constant has errors
+   |
+   = note: this error originates in a macro (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
+
+error: erroneous constant used
+  --> $DIR/defaults-not-assumed-fail.rs:33:5
+   |
+LL |     assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::B, 0);    // causes the error above
+   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ referenced constant has errors
+   |
+   = note: this error originates in a macro (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
+
+error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`.